Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Thursday, June 5, 2008

Should town take-home cars be eliminated as gas prices spike?

As gas prices soar toward $4 a gallon, what is the Town of Mooresville doing to save taxpayer dollars by conserving fuel?

At Town Hall, apparently not very much. But individual departments have recently stepped up to the plate to ease some of the taxpayer burden.

The last memo issued by Town Hall, asking the public and town employees to conserve fuel, was in September 2005 when area gas prices topped $3 a gallon. The town’s director of administration and finance, Maia Setzer, told the Report when it first started asking questions about the town's fuel usage a month ago that “there have been several conversations” about the town conserving fuel. However, she said, she is “not aware” of any recent memos from Town Hall encouraging Mooresville employees to be more efficient.

From July 2007 through April 2008, the town paid an average of about $37,000 a month for fuel. April 2008 was the most expensive in the 10-month period, with employees and officials spending more than $49,000 in fuel. The least expensive month was February, at about $25,000. For each month’s fuel expenses, click on the document below:

Setzer said the figures are based on the date of invoices and not necessarily the date of the checks. For example, she said, an invoice dated July 30 is included in July’s information even though the check was issued Aug. 2, 2007.

The town’s monthly fuel expenses reflect fuel used by the town’s service vehicles, including police, fire, sanitation, etc. and other department employees conducting town work during normal business hours.

But the totals also include fuel used by town employees who have “take-home” vehicles. And Mooresville taxpayers are footing the bill for many of those people to drive back and forth to work every day from places like Salisbury, China Grove, Charlotte, Taylorsville, Huntersville, Statesville and Troutman.

With the exception of police, the fire chief and fire marshal, town employees with take-home vehicles are taxed $3 a day, said Human Resources Director Jackie Moore. In other words, to be able to use taxpayer dollars to subsidize their drive to work and back home each day, those employees have to “pay” the equivalent of one gallon of gas – minus $1 – a day.

Interim Town Manager Erskine Smith, who lives about a mile from Town Hall, drives his town-issued vehicle back and forth to work each day. Smith did not respond to Report questions about fuel usage this week.

Public Works Director John Vest also has a Mooresville-owned take-home vehicle that he drives back and forth to work from his home. In an e-mail to the Report today, Vest -- on behalf of the public services administration, public works, utilities and engineering departments -- provided a list of ways that the public services departments are working to conserve fuel during business hours.

Vest also provided a list of department employees with town take-home cars, including himself, the public works manager, street supervisor, fleet superintendent, sanitation superintendent and the building and grounds superintendent -- all of whom, Vest points out, are "on call" for emergencies. (For Vest's complete response, click on the documents below:)











While Vest provided a list of public services employees who have town take-home vehicles, he also said that the department does not require those employees to maintain a mileage log or a log of how many times they have been called back to work after business hours.

Unfortunately, that leaves one to wonder if the taxpayers' "return" matches the "investment." For instance, it is unclear -- since no logs are maintained -- how many times Vest, listed as a resident of Salisbury, has actually been called back to work in Mooresville for an "emergency" situation. Additionally, another public services employee listed in Vest's document is said to live in the Charlotte area but drives his Town of Mooresville vehicle between home and work in case he's called back for an after-hours "emergency."

As a Mooresville citizen, I would hope that in the event of a true emergency, we wouldn’t wait the half-hour or so it would take for our public services employees to drive here from Salisbury or Charlotte.

Police officers make up the highest number of town employees with take-home vehicles. Mooresville Police Chief John Crone, in an e-mail to the Report today, provided a copy of a message that he said the police department sent to all drivers of police vehicles, offering specific ways they can reduce fuel consumption while patrolling the Mooresville community. It is unclear when the message was sent to the officers.

But specific to after-shift use of police vehicles, Crone said the department does not maintain a mileage log of officers who drive their vehicles home or to "secondary employment," including part-time, off-duty jobs such as Wal-Mart and directing traffic during lunch and class changes near the NASCAR Technical Institute.

Crone said the department also does not keep a log of the number of times officers are called back into work after their shift is over. However, he said that "members of the Special Response Team are called in most frequently (about once every two weeks for a high risk situation) while accident reconstructionists may be called back about once a month." Also, Crone added, "A detective may be called in about once a week, and each patrol officer is called back for additional manpower about once a month."

Most would agree that seeing police cars parked throughout the community provides a sense of safety and security for area residents. But the question is why many of our officers are allowed to use Mooresville tax dollars to fill up their gas tanks then drive home to Taylorsville, Troutman, Statesville, Huntersville, Salisbury, China Grove, Taylorsville, Cleveland, Lincolnton and Cabarrus and Catawba counties.

In fact, of the 48 police officers on Human Resources’ list of employees with take-home vehicles, at least 19 live outside of Mooresville.

Some may agree that it’s important for officers to have their patrol cars in the event that they’re called back into work after hours, and many would also likely agree that officers with specialized training should be able to take their police cars home. But without a log of exactly how many times regular patrol officers are called back into work, the question becomes: If the police department has officers on duty around the clock, just how often does a situation so dire arise that it has to call its regular patrol officers back to work after their shift is over?

For a complete look at Crone's e-mail to the Report, click on the documents below:



Mooresville Fire Chief Wes Greene said that he and Fire Marshal Gary Styers are the only two fire personnel with take-home vehicles, “and we both live in the town limits,” he added.

In addition to attending town meetings after hours, Greene said he uses his town car to respond to “incidents and investigations, depending on the type of incident and severity.”

Greene also forwarded a memo, dated May 28, in which the assistant fire chief instructed all Mooresville fire personnel to “bring meals for the entire day.” It states that fire equipment cannot be used to travel for food purchases and warns that “more stringent orders may follow if gas/diesel prices continue to rise.”

In conclusion, states the memo, “It is our responsibility to use every penny of tax money efficiently so that we can continue to deliver superior service to the citizens.”

To read the entire memo, click on the document below:


The town’s recreation director, Wanda McKenzie, also has a take-home vehicle. She said she lives just over four miles from her office at the War Memorial. While she said she has not kept a log of after-hour miles put on her vehicle, or the number of times she has been called back into work after business hours, “I would guess it is an average of six times a month for some reason or another,” she said.

“I do not go home at all during the day, so it is just round trip,” McKenzie said, adding, “I do, however, come back at night and on weekends for special events and sometimes just to check on things. For instance, I came by Saturday for the pool opening to make sure everything was going okay.”

She said the recreation department has taken specific steps to conserve fuel. For example, when athletic staff members visit the parks for various reasons, they are instructed to take everything they need, leave there for games and go “park to park” instead of back to the office, McKenzie said.

The recreation department also keeps a list of needed materials and supplies so that all the department’s errands can be run in as few trips as possible. “I have also asked for suggestions from staff members on ways we can conserve,” McKenzie added.

How about town commissioners? While they are allowed a mileage reimbursement for trips taken while on town business, Commissioner Frank Rader has recently begun driving a town-owned vehicle.

Rader said he drives the car – which government officials call “Big Blue” – to travel to Statesville for meetings of the Iredell County Board of Commissioners and the Iredell-Statesville Schools Board of Education. He also uses the vehicle to travel to Raleigh for meetings of the N.C. League of Municipalities, the Department of Natural Resources and “legislative meets.” He said he also drives the town car to Lincolnton for meetings of the Lake Norman Rural Planning Organization and to other places for “area conferences, summits and go sees.”

“I top it off before and after each trip … my top offs will show under Erskine (Smith)’s gas records,” Rader wrote in an e-mail to some government officials last month, shortly after the Report e-mailed questions about town employees’/commissioners’ fuel usage.

“Monday to Raleigh, (the car) got 26+ miles per gallon, calculated on pump gallons and odometer miles,” Rader wrote, noting to Town Clerk Janet Pope: “By the way, Janet, it pulled a bit to the left.

“My next use is Friday to go to Charlotte,” Rader continued. “Blue is well maintained, and I drive with traffic flow so I don’t think Blue can do any better.”

For the list of all town employees with take-home vehicles, provided to the Report by Human Resources, click on the documents below:

33 comments:

Anonymous said...

Since I am a taxpayer do you think that I can get a ride to my job? Seems like excluding the Police the only ones taking a car home are the "wheels of the town" no pun intended. Till the crisis of gas prices lower if ever. Some of them need to drive their own cars. Erskine could ride a bike to work. Looks like he needs to. He can do this why another employee of Belk Department store is in training there to be the next city manager.

Anonymous said...

Thank you, Ms. Gatton, for this information. I continue to be amazed at the depth and breadth of your investigations. What concerns me most about this article is that it clearly signals a lack of competent leadership. Should the city manager not have addressed this issue long before the Gatton Report stumbled upon it? If the manager was remiss in so doing, should the mayor not have taken the initiative? Gas prices have been elevated for some time now. The figures of town fuel usage are staggering ($25,000-$50,000 per month). Why has there been no town-wide and strict initiative to conserve fuel prior to your investigation? The failure to do so is bothersome, to say the least. We deserve more competent leadership.

Anonymous said...

Free Fuel Frankie Rides Again!

Anonymous said...

Hey Chief, the police do not work at walmart anymore, not for the past two years anyway!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

The prevelant mind set rears it's ugly head again,that of the expense does not matter. I drive to and from work everyday and I don't get paid for mileage,nor do I have a company car. The ride is part of having my job. I do get paid for 4 hours if I have to come in on call, but municipalities should be tight with the taxpayer's money. Mooresville is the first town I've ever lived in where the firemen take the truck to get "a bite." The only other times you see a truck out of the station in another town is if there is a fire, or an educational function. I bet the fuel would be cut in half if all employees drove their personal vehicles to Mooresville and back home, only using town vehicles during hours. There is another fact to think about, why all of the new vehicles? I bet a town vehicle doesn't get two(2) years of depreciation before the trade. I have seen maybe two(2) town vehicles that are returning the investment and nearing the end of their mechanical life expectancy. The fact is it is all about image. Well the only image we have in North Carolina is that of a new car! The reputation we have in North Carolina is that of a bunch of dumb a____ that can't keep a town manager or engineers, but lets be blunt about it, corrupt. The folks of North Carolina consider our town government a bunch of fools who can't walk and chew gum at the same time. Thank you again Gatton Report for exposing our incompetence for the whole world to see. The next act will be the towns, but they will only issue a memo to get the report off their back then back to drive at will. Give these folks a choice, health insurance or company car, you choose, can't have both. Thank you Jamie!

Anonymous said...

Jamie, don't know what we'll do if you ever stop investigating the going ons behind the bushes in this Town?????
What was isn't anymore, and all these blood sucking people need to use their own vehicles like most AMERICANS do. Great work, and by continuing this path, you will eventually force these poker players, to throw their hands down.
Thank You, Once again.

David Goebelt said...

Before the M-I Connection fiasco I never really paid attention to town management. But my focus has changed lately as I’ve realized how interested they are in increasing the scope and power of government.

I’ve been noticing little things here and there. For instance, as mentioned by the previous comment, why do all the town vehicles seem to be very late model? I thought it was common knowledge that you pay a premium for buying a new car. All the financial planning literature I’ve ever read tells you to never buy a new car. I guess common sense is not ubiquitous. Or maybe it just makes Mooresville cooler to have a new fleet of cars.

I will concede though, that our first responders (police, fire, and M-I Connection repairman) do need the best equipment as lives may be at stake.

As for using city cars for personal commutes, my solution would be simple. Get some real estate sized magnets for the doors that say “YOU’RE PAYING FOR MY GAS.” If that doesn’t work, I could probably come up with something creative.

Anonymous said...

The haves are alway government officials. We are told to conserve water, so they can raise our rates and let more people move in to use the water we conserved. I don't have a problem with the police taking their cars home if the live in the city. All other government employees should be driving their own car. Mileage for them would be cheaper than buying city cars and filling up the gas tank. But it is real easy to take money from the taxpayer.

Anonymous said...

Larry, you took the words right out of my mouth. Only those living in Mooresville should have the luxury of taking their vehicle home!

Anonymous said...

Wait a minute, we better be prepared for a riot at "the Show Car Show" or the $400K skatepark, or lord help us if the quilters get rowdy. I have a great idea, now that we have passed and funded the new Bicycle/Moped/Pedestrian Plan for Mooresville, let the town employees ride mopeds. I have to wonder though, which will cost taxpayers more, one month of fuel expense or paying for the Custom XXXLLL helmet for Erskine Smith. That's a scary thought in your rear view, OBJECTS MAY BE LARGER THAN THEY APPEAR.

Anonymous said...

If the Chief charges a $2.00 surcharge for the car at a secondary job, are we the town not losing money there. What if the officer is driving from salisbury or Taylorsville.We are still paying more for the use of the car and gas than we should. Make the officer pay for the gas that they make working at a for profit business.

Anonymous said...

Taxpayers should not be paying for the rides of employees outside of town. Erskine Smith should set a good example for the Town employees by parking his car at Town Hall and driving his personal car to work. That is the least he can do for the taxpayers who he screwed out of so much money with Jimmy McKnight.

Anonymous said...

Mr. Smith could save alot on gas if he'd quit lugging those golf clubs around in the back of the City car everywhere he goes - always be ready if a developer or real estate agent/friend calls to play! You really do not think he goes to "that" many meetings? Just ask the people in Town Hall, they know about Erskine and the golf. They joke about it all the time.

Anonymous said...

Today the NYSE finished at 12,083.69, oil was $136.00 a barrel, and gas hit $3.97 in Mooresville, and I still saw many town vehicles on the move. The ToM better act or we may need to investigate some sort of remedy to the current members of the town board.(Special election, impeachment, any suggestions)

Anonymous said...

Police Officers take home their cars should be allowed if they live in town, just to back up the fellow officers incase of a true emergency. If they live out of town, get a scooter...... The people of our town need to stand up for ourselves. Ms Gatton is putting out the information we need to kick some butt, however, posting your complaints here, while great, does not put a stop to whats going on. We all need to hold hands and say NO MORE. We vote them in we can VOTE THEM OUT. We say no they laugh and do as the please.... so post when and where and I'll Be There.

Anonymous said...

The Town has been screwing things up for a very long time. Has there ever been a third party audit on the Towns Books? I'll be happy to donate $1000 towards the cause. Lets start @ town hall and see how many people retire this go around. Buy the way, anyone know where I could find a Million Dollars?

Anonymous said...

"Should town take-home cars be eliminated as gas prices spike?"

The answer to this story is a big fat HELL NO!

Common sense has left the town.

Anonymous said...

Aside from take home vehicles, how many vehicles or gas guzzling SUV's does the town own? The fire chief has a perfectly good Tahoe but there is a new Explorer in his parking place at the FD. Is that really necessary? Let's see how long it takes for that vehicle to get "marked" or will it remain unmarked so Greene can drive to Beaverdam Kennels.

Anonymous said...

Hey Mooresville/Sanitation Dept,
are you ready for a lawsuit? This week I had to park in the CVS parking lot beside the tracks,to go downtown, and when I walked through the back drive of CVS which accesses main street, what did I see. I saw a white Town of Mooresville/Sanitation Dept. pick-up truck parked,RUNNING, with no one behind the wheel! The truck was running, with no one in it, radio blasting, yes an accident waiting to happen, not to mention--POOF goes the $4.00 a gallon of gas to keep the AC cold I suppose. I can only figure they were in Bob's Hotdogs for lunch. I wrote down the truck and license #, but I will cut this employee a break. I expect The Town of Mooresville to issue a safety memorandum this week about unattended-RUNNING vehicles parked on city streets. I know its hot, but the next time I see something this "RISKY"(Safety,risk management please), I will take a picture with my camera phone and let The Gatton Report post it for all to see! I expect all drivers of Town vehicles to wear safety belts when operating, when parking turn off the vehicle, put in park or gear, turn wheels per incline and set the park brake! I'm sure you have heard this before, so do it! We only want lawsuits for real cases in Mooresville, not employee stupidity or a hotdog. And readers, please do your part to keep Mooresville safe, if you see a running vehicle(ToM) take a picture and give it to the Gatton Report--a child's life may depend on it.

Anonymous said...

The article states that in the FD only the fire chief and fire marshal take vehicles home. Gary Styers lives outside the town limits and Greene has sold his house so I'm wondering where he drives his town vehicle?

Anonymous said...

To Ms. Gatton and the others who feel that police officers are over compensated for risking their lives, would you be willing to do their job? There's talk of the turnover rate at the police department, imagine what it would be if Gatton had her way and took away benefits from officers who could never be paid enough for doing a job that most of us wouldn't do. Are any of you ready to step up and risk your life for strangers, whom I think a majority do appreciate police officers? Why only target the police department? If you pay town taxes, you also pay county taxes. Call the sheriff and tell him that his deputies are over compensated also, and I would be surprised if all of the deputies live inside the county. I would also be surprised if there are enough citizens in Mooresville and the county to replace out of town or county officers. Don't stop here, call the governor and tell him the state troopers are over compensated and shouldn't have take home cars either, cause we pay state taxes also. I do not work for the town of Mooresville, but decided to comment because of last Tuesday's killing of a trooper, again doing a job that most don't have the guts to do. That is a risk every law enforcement officer takes every day. Too many times the public takes the law enforcement officers for granted. Do any of you think that any benefit, even a take home car, is really too much? Remember, officers risk their lives even for people who don't appreciate them.

Anonymous said...

I do not believe that Jaime or anyone else want to begrudge the police anything. Something DOES need to be done about the distance that some of the officers are driving-they live out of policy(more than 40 minutes away) Those are the ones that are screwing the system.

Anonymous said...

June 24th, 9:14 - you are trying to tell me that Ms. Gatton has written this blog entry because she believes (in your words) that "police officers are over compensated for risking their lives?" On top of that, to bolster your accusation, you invoke the horrific killing of the trooper last Tuesday? I had not read the article in full until I read your comment (call me crazy, but I read the comments first). I come from a long line of people on the job, so your comments raised my hackles and I went back and read this particular article. I don't know who you are and what you're selling, but after reading the article carefully, I for one am not buying.

Anonymous said...

So, where does Gatton say the police officers are overcompensated? She simply points out facts from a sheet printed on town paper. Decide for yourself whether it is in the best interest of the town and its citizens for police officers who live thirty miles away to drive your taxpayer car home on your taxpayer paid gas. More importantly, why is the car not being used for more time during the next shift, thus requiring less cars? What if the car was needed in a major emergency and the guy has to drive it back 30 miles to get there? It's a public safety and fiscal responsibility issue, period. Let the guys who live in town drive em home. Let the other guys drive their own cars or move to Mooresville. Simple solution.

Anonymous said...

Ask the one officer who lives in HIDDENITE - past Taylorsville how come he is able to go around MPD policy and work that FAR from home!!!!! And we get to pay for the gas!!!!He must be a big CRONIE!!

Anonymous said...

The simple policy answer for all of these questions involving vehicles is called a motor pool. The large cities have them where all employees drive their own vehicles to work, then while on shift, employees are assigned a vehicle for their shift, then turn it in. The reduction in wear and tear, gas, etc. is remarkable. The sad thing about Mooresville is we should have a town manager with enough experience to see this saves taxpayers money. But our town manager insists on driving a town vehicle home every day. I don't call this prudent or responsible management.

Anonymous said...

Are you talking about Erskine Smith? That's nothing but an overpaid "town manager wannabe". From what I hear we hired him straight out of the Belk's shoe department. That's what I call pertinent experience. I also hear that he's pretty certain he's going to get the full time town manager position because he's running his mouth about having the backing of Thunberg and Rader. They think Erskine is "great" and never saw the sense of searching anywhere else since he's such a prize! Who are we to look a gift horse in the mouth?>?>??

Anonymous said...

TO ALL THAT HE REPLIED ON HERE. GUESS WHAT? THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IS HIRING... OH LET ME THINK. YOU CANT DO THAT JOB. YOU ARE THINKING NO WAY WOULD I DO THAT JOB FOR WHAT THEY GET PAID. IT IS TOO DANGEROUS. TELL YOU WHAT WEAR A BULLETPROOF VEST TO WORK EVERYDAY. TELL YOU WIFE,OR HUSBAND, AND CHILDREN THAT YOU LOVE THEM, CAUSE THAT MIGHT BE LAST TIME YOU SEE THEM. YOU WILL LOOK AT THE WORLD IN A WHOLE DIFFERENT LIGHT. THE POLICE IN MOORESVILLE DO A WONDERFUL JOB. THEY KEEP YOU SAFE WHEN YOU ARE SOUND ASLEEP IN YOUR WARM OR COOL HOME, OR AT YOUR AIR CONDITIONED OFFICE.
SO GUESS WHAT GET YOUR APPLICATION FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OR SHUT YOUR MOUTH......
FOR JUST ONCE THANK A POLICE OFFICER..... INSTEAD OF BASHING THE DEPARTMENT.
WE ALL PAY TAXES. I WILL CONTINUE TO PAY AND SUPPORT THE POLICE CAUSE THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL I COULD THEIR JOB. THANKS GUYS AND GIRLS IN BLUE.

Anonymous said...

While looking at the list of take home cars I see "7" Police Captains. What in the World is going on here? With 65 or so officers? I remember the day when Mooresville had 50 officers and 1 Capt. yes 1

Anonymous said...

Police are paid oh lets say about $33,800 in Mooresville. Do you or anyone you know afford to live in this over priced city on that kind of salary?

Take home cars are an incentive that agencies use to retain police officers. You will waste more money having to hire and train a new officer than simply retaining the ones you have.

Show a little appreciation for those who put their lives on the line so you can live a "normal life."

Anonymous said...

I think police are VERY underpaid. My problem is that there are officers that ABUSE the system and lie as in OFC. Sgt Clanton. He never does anything. I work with him at the high school and he pawns everything off and talks bad about everyone. Send him off with the chief, he must have the same morals.

Anonymous said...

To the comments about the fire chief selling his house and Fire Marshall Styers living outside the town limits...Styers lives inside the city limits and has so for a while now, The new explorer is the chiefs car and his old vehicle was given to the new assistant fire marshall. This vehicle is used to inspect buildings to make sure they are safe for you while you sit down to eat your meal, or to make sure you can get out of a building when on fire while your wife spends all your money buying clothes at the local store. Also yes i believe Greene did sale his house, but what if he bought another house inside the city limits, because thats the case. Thank a police officer for keeping you safe, dont bash them on everything they may do that is not to your liking. Alot of things that happen in the departments are done for a reason that is not always what the citizens see it. yes cars shouldnt be drove to far out places like Taylorsville. Too many people look at what little things they think are wrong when they dont know the whole situation. Look at what is being done right, is the crime rate dropping in town, are our roads being protected from people who think 150 is a drag strip? If you dont respect the people who keep you safe while you are sipping on your cold beer on the couch watching football then why should they pay you the respect to go over and above the call of duty?

Anonymous said...

DOES EVERYBODY KNOW THAT THE WATER DEPT ON CALL PERSONAL SPENDS MORE TIME TURNING ON WATER VALVES FOR PEOPLE WHO DIDN'T PAY THIER BILLS AND GOT THIER WATER SHUT OFF. YOU SHOULD CHECK ON HOW MUCH IT COST THE TAXPAYERS TO TURN THIER WATER OFF AND BACK ON EVERYONES WATER THAT DOESN'T PAY THIER WATER BILL. SHOULD THE EMPLOYEES HAVE TO DRIVE THIER OWN VEHICLE TO WORK BECAUSE YOU DECIDE YOU WANT TO PAY YOUR BILL TONIGHT? WHAT ABOUT WASTE WATER? WOULD YOU WANT SOMEONE ELSES SEWER IN YOUR OWN VEHICLE BECAUSE YOU GOT CALLED IN AFTER HOURS? I THINK NOT SO THEY NEED A TAKE HOME VEHICLE. YOU WANT THE TREES OUT OF THE ROAD AND BRUSH PILES THAT SOMEONE THREW IN THE ROAD REMOVED AFTER HOURS? THATS THE STREET DEPT SUPERVISOR. TAXPAYERS SHOULD PAY FOR TAKE HOME VEHICLE. GOT A DEAD ANIMAL IN THE ROAD THEN CALL THE SANITATION SUPERVISOR. HE DOESN'T HAVE A TAKE HOME VEHICLE. SHOULD HE HAVE ONE? I THINK SO. TOWN VEHICLE BREAKS DOWN AFTER HOURS WHAT DO YOU DO. CALL THE FLEET SUPERVISOR IN TO TRY TO FIX IT OR GET IT TO THE SHOP. HE DOESN'T HAVE A TAKE HOME VEHICLE. SHOULD HE? I THINK SO. BUILDING AND GROUNDS, AND CEMETARY DOESN'T GIVE THE PERSONAL ONCALL A TAKE HOME VEHICLE. SHOULD THEY HAVE ONE? I THINK SO. THE POLICE DEPT AS A WHOLE ALL TAKE THIER CARS HOME AS A PERK FOR WORKING FOR THE TOWN AS BOARD APPROVED IT YEARS AGO. SHOULD THEY? I DON'T THINK SO, NOT EVERYBODY. SHOULD BE FOR THE IN TOWN RESIDENTS ONLY. THAT IS THE ONLY ONES THAT COULD REALLY RESPONED QUICKY. THE FIRE DEPT USE OF TRUCKS FOR TRANSPORTION TO GO EAT IS A JOKE. THE FIREMEN HAVE TO STAY TOGETHER WITH THIER ENGINE FOR THE WHOLE 24 HOURS OF THIER SHIFTS. THEY CAN'T CARRY IT ON THIER BACKS OR PUSH THE TRUCK AROUND SO THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DRIVE IT TO GET SOMETHING TO EAT. THAT SHOULD BE A PERK FOR THEM. EVERYBODY ELSE WITH A TOWN VEHICLE DRIVES IT TO GO GET SOMETHING TO EAT. REALLY THAT ISN'T A PERK IT'S JUST COMMON SENSE. I READ THIS POST THEN DONE SOME RESEARCH ON MY OWN TO COME UP WITH THIS INFO FOR EVERYONE TO READ. IN MY OPINION I THINK THE TOWN SHOULD REALLY LOOK AT WHO IS TAKING THE VEHICLE HOME AND WHY. WE AS TAXPAYERS NEEDS TO LET THEM KNOW THAT IT'S TIME FOR CHANGE. IF THEY ARE ACTUALLY ON CALL OR GET CALLED BACK THEN WE NEED TO SUPPLY THEM WITH THE VEHICLE AND TOOLS TO DO THE JOB. THAT'S BEING PREPARED. THE ONES THAT ARE JUST DRIVING BACK AND FORTH TO WORK AND NOT COMING BACK IN WHEN CALLED OR NOT EVEN GETTING CALLED IN SHOULD TURN THE VEHICLE IN AND DRIVE THIER OWN. VOICE YOUR CONCERNS TO THE MAJOR OR BOARD. JUST USE COMMON SENSE WHEN YOU DO. PUT YOURSELF IN THE OTHER ONES SHOE FIRST.