Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Friday, March 12, 2010

Man disputes police report; says plants weren't his

“There are two things in life – right and wrong, black and white. There is no gray area,” said Chris Davidson in a friendly, candid talk with the Report yesterday afternoon.

Davidson’s name is in a 1999 police report from the Iredell County Sheriff’s Office. According to the report, two officers received a tip about marijuana plants growing in a garden owned by Davidson. Upon arriving on the scene, Davidson gave the officers consent to search his property. During the search, the officers reportedly located seven marijuana plants growing in pots in Davidson’s garden.

The report narrative states that when the officers called Davidson to the yard and asked him about the plants, "Davidson stated he had already called Sheriff Redmond at the office and that we could not charge him with the plants." When the officers explained to Davidson that he could, in fact, be charged, Davidson responded: "Fuck it, it wouldn't stick." Davidson was never charged.

Davidson said that isn’t the way he remembers it. In fact, he said he never spoke to Redmond at all that day – because Redmond was at the beach with his wife.

“It was on a Friday as best as I can remember,” Davidson said. He said his secretary called him and stated that two officers from the Sheriff’s Office needed to speak with him. Davidson said he met the officers, who asked for consent to search, and Davidson said he consented without hesitation.

It all started when the animal shelter had set up a cage on his property to catch an animal, Davidson said, adding that the cage had been set up for about a week. Apparently when animal control checked the trap, the county employee stumbled upon the plants and reported them to the sheriff’s office.

The two deputies responded to the call and found the plants in Davidson’s garden. “They were found in 5-gallon buckets,” Davidson remembered, adding that the stalks had already turned brown.

Davidson said emphatically that he does not grow or use drugs. And he said he knows who is responsible for the plants in his yard – a former, disgruntled employee. “I loaned him some money, and he spent the money on doping,” Davidson said. “That’s where the pot plants came from.”

Davidson said if he were going to manufacture marijuana, it would make no sense for him to grow the plants in 5-gallon buckets and keep them in such an obvious spot – especially when he owns a sprawling 140 acres. Davidson said he even told the officers he would take a drug test to prove that he does not use drugs, including marijuana.

He said things turned a little heated when one of the officers said to him: “ ‘I’m going to take you down and charge you’.”

At that point, Davidson said he told the deputies: “Phil (Redmond) knows me, and the Narcotics boss (then Jimmy Craven) knows me – I would like to speak to them first.”

Davidson said he called the Sheriff’s Office and was told that Redmond was at the beach with his wife and would not return to the office until Monday. “His daddy had died shortly before that,” Davidson recalled of Redmond. He said the Sheriff’s Office also stated that Craven would not be available until Monday.

So Davidson said he asked the two sheriff’s deputies if the matter could wait until Monday: “I told them, ‘Let’s let it go until Monday.’” He said he assured the officers that he would meet them on Monday and that the officers had no reason to doubt that he would stick to his word. “I own a business; I’m not going anywhere,” Davidson said he told the officers, adding that he has never been arrested.

He said he told the deputies “to just call me, and I’ll come by to see you (Monday).”

Davidson acknowledged that he was a little heated because he was being accused of something that did not belong to him. He said he told the officers: “I’m not guilty, and you’re not going to ruin my good name. If you charge me, I’m going to sue the hell out of the sheriff’s department.” Davidson said he told the officers: “I’m just trying to save you a lawsuit.”

Davidson continued: “I received a call from Phil and Jimmy” (on Monday)." He said he then attended a meeting with Redmond, Craven and the narcotics officer from the scene, whose name Davidson could not recall.

Davidson said the men “didn’t give me an answer then” regarding whether he would be charged.

However, he said, “It was handled professionally. There were no strings pulled. Thank God the detective let it go until Monday.”

“They handled themselves in a very professional way,” Davidson said.

84 comments:

Anonymous said...

Tell me how many time has a man told deputys that the pot is not his.....A LEO has never been lied to have they....This is the biggest load of crap I have ever seen in print

Anonymous said...

There is nothing in that story that sounds unbelievable, and the police report doesn't offer any evidence to the contrary. Yes, LEOs get lied to every day, but they also hear the truth occasionally. Sounds like this guy was telling the truth. Why WOULD he grow pot in pots (pun intended)?

Anonymous said...

Everyone that knows Redmond knows he is dirty....If you don't beleave it just watch this post and you will see all of his puppets jump in and defend him with all there mite...How a man is defended tells me a lot about the man

Anonymous said...

I could see one plant someone may have put there. But the number of plants that were found. It is hard for me to beleave he did not know thay were there...I know what is growing in my garden

Anonymous said...

Davidson states that he knew who the plants belonged to so did he tell the ICSO and did they pursue any investigation into that person.

Anonymous said...

Although I find Davidson's story a little hard to believe I do commend him on giving Jamie an interview , wish the Sheriff would step up to the plate.

Anonymous said...

bbhhhhaaaaaJamie...how's the crow tasting this afternoon???

Anonymous said...

I believe it was a massive cover up/conspiracy. This was after they plotted to kill Kennedy. I'll bet you Davidson was the guy on the grassy knoll.

Anonymous said...

3:12...I forgot about the Kennedy conspiracy..yep, Redmond did that also!!

Anonymous said...

Redmond-2
Jamie et al-0

Anonymous said...

Could law enforcment be sued for charging someone if marijuana or any other illegal substance was found at that person's home or property? If so why? I hope the answer is no, otherwise couldn't everyone just say it wasn't there's .

Anonymous said...

2:53...I bet he "walks tall and carries a big stick" and beats everyone into submission daily. I bet he beat the crap out of Davidson until he cried mercy, and maybe even made him say uncle!!! Then I bet he gave him a wedgie until he called Jamie, all the while giving him an Indian burn until he said what the sheriff told him to. Then, for fun, I bet he gave him a swirley.

Anonymous said...

Seven marijuana plants are found in someones garden, not too far from their home , the man goes to the sheriff's office and tells the sheriff they are not his and that's it no charge because the man knows the Sheriff and the narcotics officer. Was there no investigtion done to verify the likelyhood of Davidson's story or to find out who the plants belonged to. Would a person who is not aquainted with the Sheriff been given the same kind of treatment in this kind of circumstance? I think Jamie needs to ask the Sheriff these questions it sure seems like special treatment because he knew the Sheriff.

Anonymous said...

You forgot that Redmond single handedly stopped the Cuban Missles Crisis. When the devil goes to sleep he checks his closet for Phil Redmond.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like Mr. Davidson was right when he told the officers he couldn't be charged because he knew the Sheriff.

Anonymous said...

3:38

I have heard that before, that before the Devil goes to sleep he checks his closet for Phil Redmond.

Steven said...

Isn't what Mr. Davidson said just what everyone is talking about that if you know Phil Redmond and are on his good side that you can get away with anything , Here Mr. Davidson just verified it.

Steven said...

Isn't what Mr. Davidson said just what alot of bloggers were talking about , if you know Phil Redmond and are on his good side then you can get away with anything. Mr. Davidson's interview just verifies that. SAD!!!

Steven said...

Sorry for the double post , didn't think it went through the first time.

Anonymous said...

The reason that Bin Laden is so hard to find is because he knows that Phil Redmond and his bunch of great deputies could be getting close so he hides all the time

Anonymous said...

3:49...twist it anyway you want..He told you he didn't even talk to the Sheriff. LawEnforcement not Politics my @ss. You are a sore loser.

Anonymous said...

The best way for some people to feel good about themselves is to tear down others. Please..seek help. Find someone to counsel you and address your shortcomings, and leave the Sheriff alone. Maybe your mama didn't love you enough, I don't know....but work it out man, work it out!!!

Anonymous said...

3:37 better yet why don't you bum a ride to Statesville and ask him your self then your smart ass would know for your self instead of asking Jamie to do it for you

Anonymous said...

Hey Jamie...stick to baking cookies, and stop letting a few get you in a tough spot!! I'm telling you...you are getting used, and don't even know it!!

Anonymous said...

3:59...'cause it doesn't look like Jamie does a good job asking questions does it!!!

Steven said...

To 3:56

Maybe you didn't read the article good enough Mr. Davidson states that Phil and Jimmy called him and then he went to the office and met with both of them , don't know how that is twisting anything. And don't know what you mean by law enforcement not politics. And please explain what I would be a sore loser at.

Anonymous said...

you're gay

Anonymous said...

3:58 funny you should bring that up. I was told that the reason Phil Redmond is the eogtistical tyrant that he is, is because of similar issues in his childhood. Seriously.

Anonymous said...

5:08... That makes sense. people with low self esteem tend to overcompensate for their insecurites. That may explain his lack of respect for women as well.

Anonymous said...

5:08 and 5:12...touche'. Really?? Are you two men? Cause you are very gay ones!! Maybe you two could hook up if you haven't already!

Anonymous said...

I believe that it is the sherif who has shown alot of class through all of this. I know, I know..you'll put your spin on that too. But, If I were him, I'd leave class at the door and whoop your @sses 5:08 and 5:12. Ofcourse, you both are low enough to stoop to talking about a man's childhood. Guess you live in a glass house...

Anonymous said...

Redmond can allow someone to be suspended indefinately on hearsay (see below) but can't charge someone with possession of 7 marijuana plants. They don't grow here naturally and if they did they wouldn't have grown in pots. So SOMEBODY knew they were there.

If someone put them there to set Davidson up, one or two plants would have worked just as well, why waste 7 plants?

AND if it was a setup to get him in trouble, why did an animal control officer stumble upon them after they were already turning brown. If it was a set up why was there not an anonymous tip reporting it?

Something stinks to high heaven and I do believe it is Redmonds reputation.

Back to the hearsay is good enough to play games with a man's livelyhood...

Within the last year, one of Phil's officers was fired for hearsay. The Sheriff and Harold were at the helm of that ship too. I am told that my fellow officer was not allowed to defend himself or have his supervisor present while in Redmonds kangaroo court. According to him he was suspended indefinately and told if he spoke to ANYONE other than his wife about the incident he would be charged with interfereing with an investigation. (Same use of terminology there. Interesting). Anyway he went home, thought it over and resigned.

He then tried to get unemployment until he was hired elsewhere and was denied. He appealed his case and told the investigating person that they needed to look into it better. He told him it was a hostile work environment. The decision was overturned and he is now receiving unemployment and has a document from Employment Security stating that he did nothing wrong and the Sheriffs office was at fault. So the Sheriff CAN fire someone based on hearsay, but like many of the other things he has done, it isn't very smart. I really don't think he has paid attention to how many people he has stepped on over the years but is probably starting to realize now.

Anonymous said...

5:24..The Sheriff can also fire you simply because he doesn't like you, (as can ANY sheriff) That is one of the oddicies about Sheriff Offices ANYWHERE!! So, what's your point? And, if your buddy was so bent on his convictions...why did he resign? If I didn't think I was wrong, I would never resign. Sounds like there is more to it...of course there always is isn't there? I think that Jamie's BREAKING NEWS the past two times is a prime example of that!!

Anonymous said...

Sounds to me like an internal investigation that didn't go his way...

Anonymous said...

5:35... "He has a document from Employment Security stating that he did nothing wrong and the Sheriffs office was at fault."

Yeah, there was an investigation other than internal on this one. How did that go? We need more external investigations and less internal. That would solve a lot of problems and "rumors"

Anonymous said...

5:22 thanks once again for showing how redmond and his crew work.

At 3:58 one of the Redmond/Miller defense team said, "Find someone to counsel you and address your shortcomings, and leave the Sheriff alone. Maybe your mama didn't love you enough..."

That prompted the following response:

funny you should bring that up. I was told that the reason Phil Redmond is the eogtistical tyrant that he is, is because of similar issues in his childhood. Seriously. That makes sense. people with low self esteem tend to overcompensate for their insecurites. That may explain his lack of respect for women as well.

As Redmond's people can do whatever they want and say whatever they want but everyone else better watch their P's & Q's. Damn I feel like I am on duty.

Anonymous said...

To 5:45

Can you get this guy to give Jamie his documents from the employment office so the Redmond crowd can't claim this is rumor, hearsay or no documentation

Anonymous said...

6:12... That is a very good possibility. The problem is they will twist it around like they have the father and son movie clip and now the marijuana that someone was found with. Oh wait, he gave a suspects name. Well that would clear him if the suspect was charged. They have the spin capabilities of the folks in Washington.

Anonymous said...

Good interview Jamie , I agree with some of the above posts Davidson has just proven some of the disgruntled employees points. The ones where if you know the Sheriff you wouldn't get busted for drugs.

Anonymous said...

Looks like Davidson just made the case for some of the disgruntled employees. That if you know the Sheriff you don't have to get charged for drugs. How's that for documentation boys.

Anonymous said...

Wonder how many other instances where drugs were found ended up like this one. I think the SBI or FBI or who ever needs to come in and investigate.

Anonymous said...

Just like I said in the 3rd post the hand puppets are screaming......Got to be something to this

Anonymous said...

Davidson didn't mention ever talking back to any law enforcment officers after his meeting with Phil and Jimmy so does that mean the matter was just dropped and no further investigation was done. If so why was that, those marijuana plants had to belong to someone and they were found on Davidson's property by his own admittence according, to the article.

Anonymous said...

Is there anyone that can do an investigation that doesn't take as long as the SBI.

Anonymous said...

3:37's point is the ultimate question as to if this was handled properly, Would a person that was not aquainted with the Sheriff been treated in the same matter, if the answer is no then there is a problem.

Anonymous said...

Iredell County sure does have a problem with disguntled employee's or is it just Phil Redmond and Mr. Davidson?

Anonymous said...

The article states that the man was not told if he was going to be charged or not at the time. So can Phil Redmond tell us now why he wasn't charged. Did the investigation determine that the man was telling the truth.

Anonymous said...

No one in the Sheriffs office is unhappy they all love ther jobs

Anonymous said...

Seen the Iredell County Sheriff's web page today? I guess all those drug dealers didn't know Phil.

Anonymous said...

It's funny how Redmond takes county money to have one of his idiot's sit in front of the computer defending him on every blog!! Y'all need to wake up!! He has to much power to do what he wants!! I sure would like to be in the same room with him and miller.I know who would be the one walking out!!! I am not afraid of anyone especially you two!! It's yes anonymous but right now is not the time to divulge my name but when its over and done with I'll let you know personally!!! You can say what you want I am not scared wimps!!!

Anonymous said...

There will be a bunch of us in person when the time is right. But faces won't stand out because there will be too many to count.

Phillip Redmond and Miller; Making enemies and breaking the laws since the 1990's.

Anonymous said...

Jamie,

This blog seems to be read by a few, instead of making it look like you are pushing your own politics through this site. It seems you have tried to drag the Sheriff down, and both times he either had the proof which you would not go look at, or like this story all the facts were not gathered before being published.

Why not use your site to ask questions like what can ANY of the people seeking office do that is not being done? What are their experiences? what are their views and why would they do a better job? that is what we want to know, not about an 11 year old case that was not researched and where a disgruntled employee was the person who wrote the report......or are you going to continue to attempt to crucify the Sheriff for you own personal reasons like a bully who picks on the slow kid in school.

Anonymous said...

I dont believe the Sheriff needs anyone to defend him.....his service to the citizens says it all

Anonymous said...

The Sheriff is killing the crediblity of this site, he has proven two times he was not wrong.....it says the plants were not his there is this little thing called probable cause, and it seems that after the investigation there was not enough, maybe they charged the real suspect with the plants. According to some on here I am responsible if someone puts something on my land............and I am not allowed to defend myself before getting hauled to jail, how would any person act?

Anonymous said...

Then what are you still doing here? Come on back now tomorrow, ya hear?

Anonymous said...

March 12, 2010 2:27 PM
Anonymous said...

"There is nothing in that story that sounds unbelievable, and the police report doesn't offer any evidence to the contrary. Yes, LEOs get lied to every day, but they also hear the truth occasionally. Sounds like this guy was telling the truth. Why WOULD he grow pot in pots (pun intended)?"

No. Davidson is a buddy of Phil and Jimmy. He told the cops that and they backed off. And then they were told not to charge Davidson. Nothing unbelievable about any of this. Maybe he grew them in pots so he could hide them if Phil or Jimmy called to tell him that the SBI or the FEDs were dropping by?

Lots of people look after their friends. And they look after people who give them money. Or drugs. Nothing unbelievable about that, either.

Anyone else been charged with having drugs in their car or on their land? Anyone who wasn't a friend of either Phil or Jimmy?

Sorry. Not my pot, not my gun, I don't know how that dead guy got buried under my house, what do you mean, that's my car, but, I didn't hit that old lady. Just call Phil. He'll back me up.

You people defending the Sheriff are idiots. Unless of course, you're friends of Phil and Jimmy :)

Anonymous said...

Jamie,
You have been a great help to Mooresville residents on some of your earlier blogs, however, it seems this attack on Redmond has an odor--is something rotten in Denmark? I don't know to
which of his opponents in the coming elections you are listening. Politics has gotten so bad that it's hard to get a decent person to run---so why don't you leave it alone or you'll find yourself in "THE CESSPOOL"

Anonymous said...

How many of you idiots are really trying to convence the general public that Redmond was right in this? I find it very odd that Harris does not remember the events that well. I find it odd that Davidson was treated with special options. How many of you have no clue what is around your property 90 feet out your back or front door. Was there a blood test of Davidson as he said he offered it? How does Davidson know who called in the tip on him? That sounds like Redmond and his boys really do not protect a law abiding citizen that was doing their job. Did Davidson call animal control and Thank them for doing a fine Job? DId Redmond recognize them for calling in the Pot? NO, it stinks and all the supporters can do is defend a Man who says it was not his! Well I have not saw one person charged for ownig pot. All the charges I see say possess pot. Funny, tell the public the truth. You can be charged and convicted even if it is not your pot! No they have not charged people that had pot somewhere in a 20 acres property. But we all know that is not curtiladge. 90 feet out your door in a Garden you work: Well duh !! where are the pics of the plants in the garden? was the pots partially covered by soil? or was it obvious they were just put on the top? Oh wait a minute Davidson himself said they were there over a week ... WOnder how he knew that? Teah, the disgruntled employee told him. NO - no one was ever charged with the case. So explain that supporters. Why? Also explain why the sheriff and the chief of narcotics investigated? from the office and how many other times this has happened? Do tell, so I can tell my neighbor to grow his in pots and just tell the law that shows up you all have set a precident which means it is not his unless he confesses it really is!! Typical law dogs. We take care of ours and arrest the ones that have no connections.

Anonymous said...

9:21... why do you think there are so many other candidates running? Why do you think they feel that the sitting Sheriff can be beat? Public approval of Phillip Redmond is about 20% and 15% of them say that even though they like him he has been in there too long and needs to go.

90% of the people who know him and about him say he is a crook and has always been a crook. That is the reason there are so many candidates. I know that in Phil Redmond's mind that he is God's gift to women and that men everywhere look up to him as a drug getting hero. Well it is time for reality to set in.

I am sure that all of the other candidates have different ideas about how to operate the Sheriffs Office and that could be best handled with a public forum or debate. I too want to hear those ideas. The fact is, that Phil Redmond does use the law as it suits him. This is a fine example.

By Chris Davidson's own testimony, nothing was done to him and obviously nobody went looking for the person who supposedly put seven pot plants in Chris's garden to set him up but then didn't call in an anonymous tip to get him in trouble.

Nobody has to drag up mud to be elected and this isn't Jamie G's personal vendetta against the Sheriff. People have had enough of Phillip Redmond and his crooked ways.

I like the last post at 2:50 am from the Redmond team where it say's that "Politics has gotten so bad that it's hard to get a decent person to run."

Actually Phillip Redmond has gotten so bad that everybody is running. The people of Iredell County have had enough.

Anonymous said...

March 13, 2010 12:00 AM
Anonymous said...
"Jamie,
You have been a great help to Mooresville residents on some of your earlier blogs, however, it seems this attack on Redmond has an odor--is something rotten in Denmark? I don't know to which of his opponents in the coming elections you are listening. Politics has gotten so bad that it's hard to get a decent person to run---so why don't you leave it alone or you'll find yourself in "THE CESSPOOL" "

Leave it alone? How hard would it be for a DA to empower a Grand Jury to investigate the Sheriff's office? Or for SBI to start digging through files and emails and determine whether the Davidson case is indicative of the kind of law enforcement we enjoy in Iredell County?

Where there's smoke there's fire? We've all heard that before. Well, it's a popular saying because it's common sense based.

Public servants should avoid not only impropriety, but, the appearance of impropriety. If I'm the Sheriff and one of my pals is accused of possessing drugs, I recuse myself and let someone else in my office talk with the DA to determine if charges need to be filed.

What happened in this case? If pot plants are found on the border of my property and I have no history of drug use or distribution, then perhaps charging me doesn't make sense. In my garden?

10 years ago our Sheriff was a Keystone Cop or there was special treatment of a friend. In either case, we need to know what happened. Who made the decision not to file charges.

Anonymous said...

Primaries generally have a low voter turnout. This year may be different. People are fed up and will turn out to vote if they are angry. Phillip Redmond has been his own worst enemy and won't get his face out of the mirror long enough to see it. His egotistical attitude combined with age have made him lose his edge. He used to be skilled enough to be a tyrant, break the law and still smooth things over by election. Not this time.

Look back at last election and see how many people got promotions around the department; People that Phil wouldn't have normally given promotions to because they weren't the type of people he wanted on top because they wouldn't do his bidding. They had been overlooked and ignored and were resentful and he had to pick them up so they wouldn't reflect on them at the polls.

You can only burn bridges and then build them back so many times before people are sick of you being in charge and tired of seeing your face. It is time for Phillip Redmond to go and there are plenty of candidates to vote for.

Anonymous said...

Whether Davidson is innocent or guilty is irrelevant. The truth is procedure was completely ignored. Not a good quality for an experienced sheriff. Ask yourself, if this had been a black man’s garden in south Statesville, would he have been allowed to wait and talk to the sheriff on Monday? I think not.

Redmond actually did Davidson a disservice by not following the law. If procedure were followed this would not even be an issue. Obviously, probable cause was present and Davidson should have been charged. Let me remind you the Sheriff legally does not decide one’s guilt or innocence. That is the decision of the court system. Once a person in power starts ignoring the law, chaos follows.

As a citizen I feel entitled to have answers when there are accusations of corruption by those in power. I have voted for Redmond each time he has run. However, I think it is time for him to explain some of his actions. If he makes sense I will again vote for him. If not, I will look at the other candidates.

I hope that there will be a debate with all the candidates, so we can hear their positions. That is truly what is in the best interest of the citizens of Iredell County.

Anonymous said...

1.) The pot was within the curtilage of the house.

2.) Anyone else would have been charged and had their name plastered all over the paper with "Philip Redmond said" in the narrative.

3.) They also would have placed the standard street level value on the plants which is the potential, not the actual value. How much would that be, $2500 per plant? That would be $17,500. However in this case Officer harris said it was "a few" marijuana plants.

4.) I see no indication that the person accused of trying to set up Davidson up was interviewed.

5.) If he was interviewed he wasn't charged.

6.) Nobody was charged.

7.) Phillip Redmond always wants somebody charged, even if it won't stick. He still gets the arrest numbers and the press releases no matter what the court disposition.

8.) The person who Davidson said did this to set him up never called in an anonymous tip to get him in trouble.

9.) Nobody would have wasted seven plants to set someone up. One plant is enough to be charged with manufaturing a controlled substance, maintaining a dwelling/property. (See the post below where a suspect didn't even have a plant growing and was still charged. It doesn't sound like that person got to meet with the Sheriff and the head of narcotics. Their ass went to jail and their "good name" was plastered everywhere.)

10.) Why would someone who Chris Davidson loaned money to want to pay him back by leaving seven pot plants in his garden? Someone who needs money would keep the plants and sell them to get money.

11.) Davidson said the disgruntle employee "spent the money on doping". Somebody borrowed money to get high on and then voluntarily sacrificed seven marijuana plants? Yeah, okay.

11.) It has been told that Chris Davidson was a campaign contributor last election. That needs to be checked as well. I'm not sure where you do that, but somebody knows. Raleigh maybe? Jamie, make a call.

This whole thing is a crock of crap and here is another fact. When someone is caught for a break in that person is always considered suspect in other break ins and rightfully so. That means that law enforcement structure would dictate that Redmond is guilty of dropping other charges and needs to be investigated.

It has been rumored that charges were dropped on two girls who were pepper sprayed. I would like to see the details on that one if they are there. The incident reportedly happened in Harmony.

The SBI needs to get in here and do a real investigation. I have heard that they have been here before and nothing happened. Does that mean that they are tied into the corruption in Iredell County? One can only wonder.

Anonymous said...

Here is the clipping that I spoke of in the 9:51 post. This was published in the REDMOND and LANDMARK on February 12, 2010

Mooresville man facing felony marijuana charges:

A 27-year-old Mooresville man was charged with felony marijuana counts after deputies acted on information from an anonymous source.
Sheriff Phil Redmond said Lt. D.E. Summers received information on Feb. 13 from an anonymous source that marijuana was being grown at a residence on Estes Park Drive, Mooresville.
Summers and other deputies went to the house and spoke with James Blue Anderson, who said he owned the house, Redmond said.
Redmond said deputies smelled a strong odor of marijuana when Anderson opened the door, and after some conversation, they received the OK from Anderson to search the residence.
Small amounts of marijuana, along with lights and other materials used to grow marijuana, were found throughout the residence, Redmond said.
A small amount of ecstasy was found in a subsequent search of a safe seized from Anderson's residence, Redmond said.
Anderson was charged with felony possession of Schedule I, manufacture of marijuana, maintaining a vehicle or dwelling to keep/sell controlled substances and possession of drug paraphernalia.

Now if you notice there is no mention of plants being found, only a "small amount of marijuana". But because he had grow lights and "other materials used to grow marijuana" (probably potting soil and pots) he was charged with manufacturing marijuana.

On the other hand you have somebody actually growing plants and suddenly they are just "a few" plants. Also no charges are filed. War on drugs my ass. More like a battle for votes and kickbacks.

Anonymous said...

Somebody check and see if Davidson did give money to Phil last election. That would be interesting.

Anonymous said...

You will not see Redmond in any debate with anyone one on one.He don't have the mine set to answer a question with out talking to someone about first.He will never take a chance in giving a answer that would make him look bad. This tell me that he don't have what it takes to run the Sheriff office. You have to make call that could have a big impact on people but Redmond has to ask someone what is best. To me that is a figure head not a leader....That is the reason you only hear from his people on here. Redmond has been spineless all his life even as a kid I went to school with the man I know how he is. When things are good he is first to say look what I did. But let it go bad he will be hard to fine..In 94 when he ran for Sheriff I thought it was a joke I really did. But some how he got in. And to give credit where it's due he has did a far job. But to let you all know you can bet there is someone else there making the calls. He has been there for as long as he has because he has never had anyone with a chance to win run. Im a old man Im 70 years old I can't even type this, I have to get my daughter to read it and type for me. It is all I can do to get to the bathroom at my age. I am a year or so older than Phil but Im sure at his age he is not as sharp as a sheriff needs to be. We need a Shereff that is not as I am old as dirt and can make a call with out asking and Redmond can't..I'm not sure who that would be.

Anonymous said...

“There are two things in life – right and wrong, black and white. There is no gray area,” said Chris Davidson and he is right. It is black and white that there were marijuana plants in his garden and nobody was charged for them when anyone else would have been. Redmonds position as a law breaker is black and white too. I think it is called Obstruction of Justice.

Anonymous said...

I guess the Redmond team has decided to ignore this and hope it goes away. That is always an option I suppose albeit not a good one. When is the video going to be released by the way? Public information. At leaset WSOC could do the airing that Phil said they were going to. Donna Swicegood also hitched her carreer and reputaion to Redmonds team and said that it is not Harlod in the video. So when is the Redmond & Skidmark going to do that article clearing Harold of any wrong doing?

Lots to be done and waiting, waiting. I guess the stratedgy is to drag this out past the primary so Phil can POSSIBLY squeak by again. There are 51 1/2 days left until then. That can't happen. In favor of Phil or against Phil the public needs the truth now.

Anonymous said...

Where is Donna on the undercover operation net's drug story today.

Anonymous said...

7:55

you are a idiot if you think Redmonds approval is 15-20% he is more around 75-80% the man is a great sheriff, look at the stats...until another person running for his job can tell us what they are going to do I will continue to support him.

Anonymous said...

AMEN 8:15

Anonymous said...

A sheriff should have the following characteristics:

Common Sense
Integrity
Decision Making Skills
Public Persona-Real or Imagined
People Skills
Knowledge of the Laws

Who does this describe best? Let your answer be heard in May.

Anonymous said...

I am so glad you and Redmond thinks he has 75 to 80% approval I guess the others running can pack up there little rag bag and just go home....WHAT FRIGGING TREE DID YOU JUST FALL OUT OF..You need to get out of the Redmond circle and talk to to people in the county..I have spoken with I know 250 people in the last 2 weeks from the north end all the way to the south end and out of the 250 I have spoken with 1% has Redmonds approval. Yes thats right 1%... I was shocked myself... I can't put in print what most have said about Redmond..It is unbeleavable how many people can't stand Redmond. And most of it is comming from his adulteress behavior. I never knew Redmond was such womenizer untill now but it looks like a lot of people in this county does

Anonymous said...

8:15 I didn't say that Redmond's approval rating was at 15-20%. I said that it was at 20% and out of those 20% that said he is okay, 15% of those said he has been in too long and needs to go.

That means that he is looking at about 5% that will vote for him.

Another local person who has been asking about Redmond and getting feedback has told me that 2 out of 3 people go off and tell him what a crook Redmond is. This individual said that from what people have told him, he can't believe he is still in office. I told him to join the crowd.

Anonymous said...

I have heard that the Redmond crowd is trying to cause problems for the reporting officer of the above investigation on another Blog. There are NO limits to what they will do to past or present employees. The intimidation that they have used for years is becoming more open and public every day. It is ironic that the same measures they are taking to protect themselves only open the door for their true selves to be seen. The further this goes along, the more obvious the truth will become.

Anonymous said...

This is why cops need a union and the State of North Carolina needs to be run by the Federal Government.

North Carolina is backward, corrupt and proud of it.

Anonymous said...

Most states are corrupt. The United Staes are corrupt. Washington is corrupt. What needs to be done is for the honest citizens to expose things and demand that they are made right. That is the purpose of this blog and the purpose of many here. The rest are here to defend those accused so they can continue to benefit from the corruption. It is easy to spot who they are.

Anonymous said...

I see where the court house was set on fire this morning and Bobby Lutz the basketball coach at Unc at Charlotte was fired so I quess all you A$$'$ will try to blame this on Redmond, Harold or Jamie.

Anonymous said...

You can request public information

http://www.co.iredell.nc.us/Departments/Elections/election.asp

Iredell County Board of Elections
203 Stockton Street
Statesville, NC 28677
(704) 878-3140

Anonymous said...

Rev Green wil the BBQ Saturday have home made yams or the ones out of the can? Homemade better than the can ones

Larry Green said...

Sorry -- haven't been on the blog -- I have no idea about the yams, but I'll pass along the comments for the chefs for next BBQ. I just help out with the meat and the cleaning

Anonymous said...

Thanks, heard several comments there Saturday that they wished that the people would fix homemade yams or another side of some type and not the round type yams,
But the BBQ was GREAT!!!. I know this is not what the blog was for but knew you could get it to the right people

Larry Green said...

Thanks, again, for the comments -- and even more thanks for supporting our missions program by purchasing BBQ. I don't eat slaw or yams, so I have no personal knowledge about any of that stuff, but have sent an e-mail to appropriate folks sharing your comments.

Now back to regularly scheduled blog programming.

Anonymous said...

Come on Jamie... Take all this bull shit about Miller and his son and the sheriff off your blog. I know you tried to ruin him. Look at Channel 9 they just did a story and the thief has been arrested and confessed and evidence recovered in his home and it was not Miller. You need to delete all the blogs that had been posted. I have been a fan of yours and if you don't show that you will do whats right never again will I read your column. What say you?