Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Monday, October 13, 2008

Town commissioner, MDC board member respond to citizens' questions

When we say we expect open government, that doesn’t mean we expect perfect performances from our community leaders and government officials … or that we expect them to know all the answers to every question, every time.

What is does mean is that we expect them to be responsive. When we have a question, we expect them to answer it; when we have a concern, we expect them to address it.

Some folks have expressed some very legitimate concerns about last week’s hiring of Kim Atkins – wife of Town Commissioner Miles Atkins – as executive director of the Mooresville Downtown Commission (MDC).

On Friday, I took your concerns to the people who could best answer them. Within just a few hours, they had all responded, acknowledging the merit of the concerns and offering an “open-door policy” for any further questions.

Conflicts of interest?
One reader asked about a potential “conflict-of-interest clause” that may prevent Kim Atkins – as a former unpaid member of the MDC's board of directors – from stepping down and then becoming a paid employee of the organization. “There are supposed to be documented rules and procedures to prevent conflicts of interest,” the reader posted. “Those steps and procedures are required BY LAW to be documented and kept in place. If they are not, they will lose their non-profit status with the IRS and could face conflict of interest charges.”

The reader added: “The bylaws or organizational documents MUST address how directors may or may not be compensated or apply for positions that are compensated. The conflict of interest documents must also outline how the remaining directors shield themselves from conflict of interest because they were colleagues of the former director.”

Article V, Section 11 (b) of the MDC’s bylaws states that a person cannot simultaneously serve as executive director of the downtown commission and as an unpaid member of the organization’s board of directors.

To read the MDC’s bylaws, click on the documents below:





The reader also asked about potential conflicts of interest between town commissioners – specifically, Atkins’ husband, Miles – and the MDC board of directors. “How do they (the MDC directors) shield themselves from the fact that the director's husband is an elected official? Was there any undue burden placed on those directors, or did they feel as if there would be if they did not hire her? Does Atkins have any regulatory authority over them or their businesses? Any influence at all?”

“Those are very, very valid concerns,” Commissioner Miles Atkins said on Friday. “And honestly, I would have the same questions.”

Town Attorney Steve Gambill has already addressed the question of whether Commissioner Atkins will be able to vote on matters that impact the downtown district. Citing N.C. General Statute 160A-75, Gambill said a commissioner “shall not be excused from voting ‘except upon matters involving the consideration of the member’s own financial interest or official conduct …’

“Thus,” said Gambill, “if funding by the town of the downtown commission would financially benefit Commissioner Atkins (for example, if the funding will pay in whole or in part Ms. Atkins' salary), he can disclose it to the board and ask to be excused from voting on that particular matter.

“This feature of the statute in and of itself helps to prevent a conflict of interest when a board member's own financial interests are involved,” Gambill said, “and it offers a resolution by allowing such member to be excused from voting on that particular matter.”

Commissioner Atkins vowed that he will “disclose my relationship with my wife and recuse myself from a vote if it has even the slightest perception of a conflict.”

But that’s unlikely to placate some members of the public, such as the reader who posted this: “Even if Adkins (sic) doesn't vote on Downtown Commission issues, we all know that there are conversations and arrangments (sic) made between commissioners. You scratch my back; I'll scratch yours. That kind of thing. And even if it never happens this way, people will always wonder if it is happening and it will taint the Board. And it will taint Miles Adkins. Already has.”

Another comment suggested that other commissioners “will give him and vote (sic) what he wants for his wife and things to make his life more comfortable.”

Responding to the allegations, Atkins said he had absolutely nothing to do with the MDC's hiring of his wife as executive director, but that he “completely understands” peoples’ concerns.

“If the shoe were on the other foot,” Atkins said, “I’d be asking the same thing.”

He said it is an unfortunate truth that “power can corrupt, and people can abuse power.”

Atkins, as a private citizen in 2005, spearheaded the town’s adoption of a Code of Ethics for elected officials. “I live by the same standards that I apply to anyone else,” he said. “But if in any capacity I have ever abused the power or authority graciously given to me by the people of this community, then I expect to be held accountable for it.”

The hiring process
Readers have also asked about the MDC's hiring process: How many candidates applied? How far and wide was the search? Did the board of directors choose the best candidate? Did Kim Atkins close her Main Street business and step down as chairman of the board of directors just so she could apply for the executive director’s position?

“Man are we lucky or what,” one reader posted on Oct. 9. “People from all over the country were interviewed and guess what? The most qualified person for this position was someone from right here in Mooresville! Imagine that! And, she is a former board member AND she just happens to be the wife of a town commissioner. What were the odds of that happening? Does the Downtown Commission really think this does not look just a little suspicious?”

Kim Atkins announced in July that she would be closing her Main Street business, The Garden Party, in September due to the downturn in the economy. She does not own the building in which her business was situated.

Atkins resigned as chairman of the downtown commission’s board of directors in August; a new chairman was appointed on Aug. 18. Atkins applied for the executive director’s job on Sept. 9, and she was hired last week.

John Amon, a downtown businessman and MDC board member, said the selection committee – which included MDC members and representatives from the Mooresville Convention & Visitors Bureau (MCVB), the Mooresville-South Iredell Economic Development Corporation (MSIEDC) and the Mooresville-South Iredell Chamber of Commerce – considered 22 applicants “from as far away as Georgia and Ohio.”

The selection committee included the MDC’s Robert Holshouser, Howard Kosofsky, Steve McGlothlin, and David Miller, along with Leah Mitchum (MCVB representative), Karen Shore (Chamber representative) and Russ Rodgerson (MSIEDC representative).

“The committee was made up of very reputable people who dotted their Is and crossed their Ts,” Amon said. “I personally have not seen the other resumes that were submitted, but the committee has said that Kim’s resume was head and shoulders above the others.”

Additionally, Amon said, “I do not believe that any decision was made to have Mrs. Atkins resign (from the chairman’s position) because she was -- wink wink -- going to get the job. The people on that committee did a lot of work, and I believe that they did not have any pre-conceived ideas about the job or the person to be hired.”

He said the committee, during the selection process, “pared the applicants (from 22) to around 8 and then held face to face interviews.

“Kim Atkins was the choice by everyone on that board committee and that was presented to the entire MDC board,” Amon said. It was then that the MDC board offered the position to Atkins, he said.

Amon said while the MDC board of directors advertised the position on a state level, “the job wasn’t that appealing to a lot of people” because the pay is disproportionate to the job duties.

While Atkins’ salary has not yet been confirmed, the former director, Wayne Frick, made $46,000 plus benefits – no more than $56,000 total – according to Amon and the MDC’s most recent budget. Amon said Atkins will likely be making less than Frick after factoring in insurance and benefits.

So, why didn’t the downtown commission hire a headhunter or broaden its search?

That’s simple, said Amon. The budget of the downtown commission is only $117,000. The most recent budget anticipates $60,000 from the Town of Mooresville, $52,000 in district tax, and an additional $5,000 in “ADV & entertainment” revenue.

In addition to the executive director's salary and benefits, the MDC budgets about $25,000 a year for entertainment and advertising, $11,500 for festivals and events, and thousands of dollars for expenses such as beautification projects, a merchants' newsletter, "facade grants," insurance and accounting.

In the current budget year, the MDC plans to cover half the cost of the sprinkler system in the John Franklin Moore park, at a cost of $3,250. The organization also plans to spend $600 for tulip bulbs for the park and $10,000 for a promotion that will attract people to downtown every Thursday and Friday from Thanksgiving to Christmas. The $10,000 includes co-op advertising, Christmas lights and trees, a window-decorating contest, fliers for the schools and movies at the Citizens Center. Amon said the Christmas lights "are a one-time purchase and are long-lasting LED low wattage bubs that should last a long time."

A headhunter would have cost the MDC $10,ooo to $18,000 to find a candidate for the executive director’s position, said Amon. And typically speaking, a headhunter doesn’t target $45,000-a-year candidates. Such a salary “doesn’t get a lot of people excited, from a headhunter’s standpoint,” Amon said.

The simple truth is that the downtown commission, a non-profit 501(c)4 on a set $117,000 budget, couldn’t afford a headhunter and a more expensive executive director.

In addition to that, Amon said, “If we had gone with a headhunter, we were looking at 120 days from the time we signed a contract until we had a person.

“Everyone is struggling like crazy,” he said of the downtown merchants. “I think time is of the essence. We needed someone right now.”

Also, he said, “We need somebody that understands Mooresville and North Carolina law. Different states do things differently. Kim is going to bring so much because she knows the dynamics of this region.

“And who’s to say that Kim wouldn’t have been the headhunter’s pick?” Amon added.

He also addressed some of the concerns about the MDC’s potential hiring of a consultant for a couple months. Though “a consultant has not been hired nor agreed upon,” Amon said, the MDC is considering hiring one to help Atkins and the MDC board “understand what are justifiable goals.” Amon said that is “something that hasn’t been done in the past.”

He said the role of a consultant is not to “train Atkins” as one Report reader suggested. Instead, he said, a consultant will help strengthen some of the MDC’s weaknesses in general.

He said the MDC wanted an executive director that “has some marketing experience … somebody that can understand what the downtown merchants are dealing with and understands that the property owners want the values of their property to go up. We need a liaison with other municipal functions and someone who is good at grant writing and who is familiar with the Main Street USA program, which is on a state and national level."

A candidate who is strong in each and every one of those areas, he said, “is impossible to find.” A consultant will help strengthen the areas in an executive director that “may be a little weak," Amon added.

He said the MDC wanted an executive director “who is going to grow as our needs grow,” and, he said, the MDC board feels strongly that Kim Atkins is the perfect fit.

Amon invites anyone with further questions about the MDC and its hiring process to attend the organization’s monthly meetings. The MDC meets the first Wednesday of each month at 1 p.m. in the Charles Mack Citizens Center, and its meetings are open to the public. “We would love to hear ideas on how Mooresville can better serve the citizens, merchants, and property owners,” Amon said.

120 comments:

Anonymous said...

Well, it appears that Gatton isn't as biased as her detractors suggest. I'm sure they'll now say that Amon is part of the growing conspiracy and that Amon is now part of the "in group".

Thanks for providing timely, informative, and well balanced information.

Anonymous said...

When Mr. Frick announced his retirement it was all over town wheter it was on the up and up or not that Mrs. Atkins would be the next director.
I wonder why everyone in town would think this?
But quess what it happened. He may fool some of you people but he will never fool me again. I thought he would be great but never again will I vote for him.
Now I wonder why we talk about the former commissioners and we have one that is on the road to gain from his election.

Anonymous said...

Miles is da man!!!

Anonymous said...

Oh come on 3:19, you know you didn't vote for Atkins.I think he addressed you when he said that if you think he has abused his position then you can make the decision not to vote for him next time.He's a man that stands by his decisions and is trying to do the right thing for the tax payers.He has alot of integrity and I will vow to offset your vote against him in the next election.Thank God for democracy.

Anonymous said...

Can Mr. Amon or some one with KNOWLEGDE not the guesser's please explain why the By-Laws were changed on June 3,2008.
What was changed from the orginal by laws, could it be something to benefit Mrs. Atkins?

Anonymous said...

They were amended because the downtown commission had operated for all these years without officially adopting them.They were adopted finally when Kim Atkins became chairman and realized that the commission was operating without them.

Anonymous said...

Already the conspiracy theory begins. If you would like to know why the bylaws were changed, then call Mr. Amon and find out. Or better yet, go to their next meeting and ask. I'm sure they'd be happy to answer your question.

Anonymous said...

Only 2 commissioners will come out to the Town Hall meeting, but I bet the rest of them will be here:

http://www2.mooresvilletribune.com/content/2008/oct/13/skate-parks-grand-opening-set/

Anonymous said...

I was one of the readers that has been highly critical of the appointment of Mrs. Atkins. I would like to thank Jaime for getting to the bottom of this story so quickly, but would also like to remind everyone that Miles and Jaime are pretty close. It was surely easy for them to formulate this Public Relations campaign, as they are very close. I don't disbelieve what Miles has said.

Just imagine how jaime goes for the throat of those that she either doesn't care about or plain old doesn't like.

It took several readers posting comments for Jaime to work with Miles on coming up with this PR campaign to dispel the issues. Why didn't she do this upfront? Because she likes the Atkins.

This is a puff piece.

Anonymous said...

Ms. Gatton never leans toward those she favors in her writing. She only tells the truth. I am very close to her, but by God if I did something wrong...I would expect her to do the right thing....

Anonymous said...

I second that, Mom Sue.

6:02, you thanked Ms. Gatton for "getting to the bottom of this story quickly" and then turned around and called her article a "puff piece".

You have every right to post here. Ms. Gatton has made that so. However, your posts serve no other purpose than to remind us of how shallow you are.

Anonymous said...

Jamie, there's always one in every crowd that'll damn you if you do and damn you if you don't. Let it slide.

Anonymous said...

I hate to pee in your cornflakes 6:02 but I’ve been reading this blog since April and I've seen a lot of times that Ms. Gatton has followed up blog posts with other posts because of what we say in the comments…..even one ones that made John Crone and Bill Thunberg look good.....and I’d bet they’re one of the ones that you would accuse Ms. Gatton of just “plain old not liking”. I just went back through the articles and below are a few examples that I found.

http://thegattonreport.blogspot.com/2008/09/former-chief-files-grievance-over.html
and
http://thegattonreport.blogspot.com/2008/09/crones-grievance-and-towns-personnel.html

http://thegattonreport.blogspot.com/2008/03/morrison-plantation-still-mess-after.html
and
http://thegattonreport.blogspot.com/2008/03/morrison-plantation-developers-not.html

http://thegattonreport.blogspot.com/2008/04/which-way-is-wind-blowing-for-mdc.html
and
http://thegattonreport.blogspot.com/2008/04/danger-of-one-idea.html

You’re not interested in the facts but most of us here are……or we wouldn’t be here.

Anonymous said...

I'm personally thrilled with the hiring of Kim Atkins. I can't wait to see how our downtown area is changed for the better. I think the selection board acted prudently and with Mooresville's best interests in mind. I'd rather see this job go to a local candidate who knows the needs and characteristics of the community.

I hope one of the first orders of business will be finding tenants for our urban brownfields such as the old K&D location and the old location of Burlington Industries. I'd love to see a mixed use indoor mall occupy the old mill. We have been a fortunate community to thrive and prosper despite the exit of textiles and their cottage industries. Many communities would have floundered economically during that exodus. Under the leadership of commissioners and civic leaders of the past and present, we have become a newsmaker capturing headlines across the country for development rates. I am confident we will continue to have industry and enterprise continue to seek Mooresville and Iredell County as their home and I'm excited to see what the MDC Board Director has in store for us all. Congratulations, Kim.

Anonymous said...

6:16, give me a break. If this had happened to John Crone's wife, Jaime would have been asking all the questions that the readers have been asking. Instead, Jaime just posted the fluff piece that was originally posted. After seeing the investigattons turning on one of Jaime's buddies, she worked with Miles and Kim to come up with some PR control. That's exactly what this is.

Miles told Jaime that if the shoe were on the other foot, he would have asked the same questions. He said that these were excellent questions that were deserved. If that were the case, why didn't Jaime ask them to begin with?

We all know why.

This is a joke. Get a real job.

Anonymous said...

6:41, There is more than one in this crowd. The problem is when the target of the attacks is someone that you like or are friends with. That's what happened here with Jaime and with you.

Anonymous said...

You admitted that Mr. Atkins called them great questions. So what exactly are you bitching about?

Complain all you want about Jamie Gatton but this is her blog and she can write about the price of eggs in China if she wanted to. It's the reader's job to decipher between what's fact and what's spin. She can be best friends with Mr. Atkins if she wants to. What counts is that Mr. Atkins is an elected person who responded to your questions, and he did it without missing a beat.

Eat your heart out, toots.

Anonymous said...

I'm a huge supporter of this blog but, I have to agree with the "puff piece" comment above.

It reads like a press release propping up one side and doesn't have the Jaime bite I am used to when something needs to be questioned.

Anonymous said...

Are we going to critique Gatton's writing......or are we going to discuss the issues here?

Anonymous said...

ATKINS FOR MAYOR!!!

Anonymous said...

Well 8:43 there's always the newspaper.

We'll miss you!!!!!

NOT.

=)

Sorry--back to the issues now.......

Anonymous said...

Dear 8:49 and 8:52, deflect all you want, but the story is the issue here. It may not be one that you would choose to discuss, but some of us would like to discuss. Don't let the back button hit you on your butt on your way out.

Anonymous said...

Huh???

Fieldstone Presbyterian Church said...

Can we stick to the facts of the issue and not the personal attacks on either side of the divide?

The concerns regarding ethics were anticipated by Jamie and she included that issue in her first article. She wasn't prodded to ask those questions. Her second article on this issue was a follow-up from the many comments provided by folks like you and me.

Secondly there are a lot of "what if" scenarios out there: If this had happened to John Crone's wife, Jaime would have been asking all the questions that the readers have been asking. Seems to me that Jamie did exactly that -- asked all hte questions the readers have been asking.

Personally, I don't deal with "what if" scenarios because that sort of speculation isn't productive. All I can go on are the facts available to me. If I wanted to know about the hiring practices of the downtown commission, I'd go and get that information. If I wanted to see the documents for CFK, I'd go review them for myself.

Jamie's job isn't to do the questioning of the bloggers. Hers is simply to provide the investigative skills to continue to shed light on the many facets of Mooresville and Iredell which quite possibly need to be changed.

One of the challenges facing this community is removing the fear from retaliation which appears to exist within this community. There is an immense amount of strength in numbers as well as protection. Come to the meeting on Wednesday and voice your questions. Go directly to the source and be part of the first step to restore trust in our government. Or, stay hidden and anonymous.

Yes, I realize there are many who could risk a lot by attending and by not posting anonymously, but at some point you have to decide whether or not you're willing to release that last chain of imprisonment and experience freedom.

Anonymous said...

This is what "open, honest, accountable" looks like. It is not about being perfect and never making mistakes. It is about being open, honest and accountable - period. Commissioner Miles Atkins is to be applauded for his proactive stance in allaying concerns of citizens instead of judging, questioning, minimizing, or ignoring those concerns. We are hopeful that other town officials will follow his lead in other matters affecting their constituency.

Anonymous said...

Yes, I feel so much better about a commissioner's wife whose own business failed being paid taxpayer's money to revitalize the very area where her own nationally recognized business failed.

The sheep are so easy to herd aren't they?

Kudos to Mooresville!

Anonymous said...

Can you imagine how productive this blog would be if we didn't have people stooping to personal attacks? Small minds dwell on people. Broad minds dwell on issues and solutions.

Anonymous said...

This blog will continue to be productive in spite of the personal attacks. It would be nice though if the people who are intent on attacking Miles & Kim Atkins, Jamie Gatton, Larry Green and Fariba & Cliff Homsley would just start their own blog or start adding more to the discussion then their worn out convoluted conspiracy theories.

Anonymous said...

I was a little concerned about Mrs. Atkins being selected as the executive director. I especially wondered if the downtown group had searched enough, but John Amon's explanation about the headhunter really made sense. Can we really be any worse off with Mrs. Atkins than we were before she was hired? I wish her luck and look forward to seeing the results of her work. Our downtown is really neat and it's full potential needs to be realized. Thanks for this article!

Anonymous said...

October 13, 2008 10:53 PM

No amount of scrutiny can create that which is not there.

By his very bevhaior, it appears that unlike others, Atkins has nothing to hide.

Anonymous said...

Personally, I think the MDC missed it on this decision. They should have taken the time and funds necessary to hire a headhunter to help them with this search. This Director’s position should not have been taken lightly or rushed into. If it took time and money to do the job and do it right, then so be it. As for paying for a headhunter, Frick was making about $5,000/ month. He left June 30 I think so the MDC has saved $5,000/month for July and August; that's $10,000 there. There should also have been funds in the 'Fund Balance' or savings from prior years that could have been used if necessary. Plus, Amons is already talking of spending money for a consultant to assist Kim. How much is that costing and where is that money coming from? Maybe the first priority should be hiring the best qualified person. The MDC’s own job description talked about someone with a proven track record in Downtown revitalizations. I'm not sure I understand Kim's qualifications in that. Perhaps if that person had been found and hired the expense of a consultant would not be necessary.

And then there’s the question of duties and responsibilities of the Director. Where are those? Who does the Director report to and who is responsible for her performance? That has been an ongoing question in the past and it should be addressed. Was she given a specific period of time to accomplish specific goals?

We all know that it is much easier to hire someone than it is to terminate them, especially someone whose husband sits on the Town Board and funds the very organization that would have to terminate her.

Still doesn’t feel right to me. And I’ll say it again, I like Kim and Miles. It’s not personal. It just doesn’t feel right.

Anonymous said...

Dear 12:42, don't you get it? Jaime has already blessed this hiring. Atkins has too, regardless of the fact that it is his wife. We like Jaime and Miles far too much to question this any further. Now, let's please talk about something else.

Anonymous said...

does anyone know why Soiree is closed?

Anonymous said...

I loved the MDC's decision to hire Kim Atkins. When I think about who we had there before her, it seems this is a 1,000 times improvement. Thank the heavens.

Anonymous said...

probably because the prices are so high.Why don't they just fix regular food like other places instead of trying to be so fancy

Anonymous said...

Soireee - The Business Journal reported a $73,000 tax lien filed against Soiree. I think that means Soiree did not send the state the sales tax they collected on food they sold. Not a good sign. If I'm not mistaken, there was another lien filed against them previously. Usually what this means is that the business is spending more money than they are taking in and that they don't have cash on hand to send the tax money to the state when it's due.

Anonymous said...

From looking at the By Laws, it looks hiring Atkins will take a vote from the Board of Directors. Has the Board met and voted? I would think the next meeting the first Wednesday in November would be the time for the vote but maybe not.

Anonymous said...

Sounds like the Soiree is about to go belly up. I have a great idea maybe they can get the owners a job with the dowtown commission if they are related to a town commissioner.
Possibly they can be the consulant to train Mrs. Atkins since they all have such great business sense.

Anonymous said...

Archive for Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Sheriff Carona indicted

By Paul Pringle and Christine Hanley, H G. Reza
October 30, 2007 in print edition A-1

Orange County Sheriff Mike Carona has been indicted on federal corruption charges stemming from a lengthy investigation into allegations that he had misused his office for financial gain, law enforcement officials said Monday.

The indictment, filed under seal, is expected to be made public soon, perhaps as early as today, officials said.

A one-time close friend of Carona, former Assistant Sheriff George Jaramillo, already has pleaded guilty in the case, his attorney confirmed Monday. In the plea, Jaramillo admitted that he had collected cash and gifts worth about $45,000 and had filed false income tax returns concealing the income.

As part of the plea agreement, Jaramillo is cooperating with prosecutors in the continuing investigation of Carona. “He has cooperated in the past, has cooperated while in jail and will continue to cooperate in the future,” said Jaramillo’s attorney, Robert Z. Corrado. Jaramillo currently is serving a 12-month sentence on state charges.

Federal investigators “were asking questions about Carona’s activities since he was elected sheriff,” Corrado added. Investigators asked Jaramillo specifically about “gifts and monies” Carona had received, the attorney said.

Jaramillo and prosecutors reached the plea agreement months ago. It was sealed while investigators continued to pursue the case against Carona but is expected to be made public at an arraignment today, officials said.

Carona’s longtime political adviser and attorney, Michael Schroeder, said federal authorities had not questioned the sheriff or officially informed him he was a target of the federal investigation. Schroeder, who was in Amsterdam on business, also said that rumors of the investigation had not distracted Carona from his job.

“He’s focused on the fires,” said Schroeder, who does not represent Carona in criminal matters.

Carona’s defense attorney, H. Dean Steward, did not return a call to his cellphone. The sheriff did not respond to a request for an interview.

An indictment would mark a spectacular fall for the 52-year-old sheriff, who only five years ago was widely seen as a rising star in California Republican politics. Carona received widespread attention after he led the search for the killer of a 5-year-old girl, Samantha Runnion, whose kidnapping and murder captivated the nation. In the months after that case, Carona was often mentioned as a possible lieutenant governor candidate on a slate with Arnold Schwarzenegger.

But even as he gained attention in the political realm, Carona was coming under attack from critics who accused him of improper management and ethical lapses.

His conduct had hurt the department’s integrity and morale, according to the critics, who pointed in particular to allegations that he had issued badges and concealed-weapons permits to campaign contributors without background checks or ensuring that they had proper training. Carona denied that the badges were political favors and said his conduct was proper.

Despite attacks on his character and repeated calls for his resignation, Carona was narrowly reelected to a third term as sheriff in 2006. By then, however, state and federal investigations into his conduct had begun.

In August, the state Fair Political Practices Commission agreed to a settlement in which Carona paid a fine of $15,000 for eight incidents in which he had billed his campaign committee for thousands of dollars in non-itemized expenses that he listed only as “loans.”

Those charges arose after The Times reported last year that Carona had billed his elections committee for an estimated $130,000 in loans from 2001 to 2003 that were actually expenses.

The Times reported in January 2006 that federal officials subpoenaed records from Carona’s reserve deputy program and election committee. This followed disclosures that the government had subpoenaed documents from his charitable foundation.

The full scope of the federal investigation remains unknown. But one apparent focus is a scheme outlined in Jaramillo’s agreement to charges of tax evasion and mail fraud. Jaramillo’s plea could lead to a sentence of as much as 23 years in prison and tens of thousands of dollars in fines. But Corrado said he hoped his client’s cooperation would spare him a lengthy sentence.

The 30-page plea agreement describes Jaramillo’s involvement with individuals identified as “M.C.” and “D.H.” Corrado said the initials stand for Carona and former Assistant Sheriff Donald Haidl.

The plea agreement says that beginning in late 1998 or early 1999, Haidl arranged for Jaramillo and Carona to be appointed to the boards of directors of several companies that paid them compensation or honorariums. In the plea, Jaramillo conceded receiving $7,000 from Charity Funding Services, a firm owned by Haidl’s uncle. The plea agreement says Carona also received monthly payments from the charity company, as well as an unspecified amount of cash from Haidl.

In addition, the agreement said, Haidl used a partnership he controlled to pay about $23,700 in lease costs for Jaramillo’s 1997 Mercedes-Benz. The partnership later sold the car for $12,000.

Jaramillo broke the law by failing to report either the $7,000 or the $23,700 on his income tax returns, according to the agreement.

The agreement states that Jaramillo defrauded citizens of “their right to his honest services” by failing to report thousands of dollars in gifts he received from Ed Grech, owner of a company in Brea that manufactures custom limousines. As a public official, Jaramillo was required to report gifts on state disclosure forms that are filed each year and made available to the public.

The plea agreement refers to the gifts as being given by “E.G.,” but Corrado confirmed that the initials refer to Grech. Among the gifts were $12,000 in cash in 2003; travel and hotel accommodations, including a $6,000 trip to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, in 2001, that involved the use of Grech’s private plane and yacht; a $456 stay in Las Vegas; and a tailored suit and 12 custom dress shirts worth $2,500.

Jaramillo was first accused of misusing public funds and conflict of interest in 2004. Those accusations involved allegations that he had worked as a paid consultant for CHG Safety Technologies Inc. of Newport Beach, which had designed a high-tech laser device to stop cars fleeing police.

Jaramillo helped stage demonstrations of the invention with sheriff’s deputies. In 2005, the Orange County Grand Jury charged Jaramillo with conspiring with CHG owner Charles H. Gabbard to obstruct justice and take bribes to help promote the device.

The bribery counts alleged that Jaramillo was paid in 2000 and 2001 with three checks totaling $25,000. The fourth bribery count alleged that Gabbard gave Jaramillo’s sister-in-law, Erica Hill, a job as a clerical assistant at Jaramillo’s request. Hill was initially arrested and charged with Jaramillo, but prosecutors later dropped the charges.

Then, in January 2007, Jaramillo pleaded no contest to lying to the grand jury and misusing a county helicopter. He agreed to serve a year in jail as part of the plea.

Jaramillo has been serving his state sentence in a pay-to-stay facility in Montebello and is expected to be released next month.

Anonymous said...

Just because I don't think one story here measures up to what we have come to expect doesn't mean I'm going anywhere, thank you.

I don't think there should have been a headhunter for this position and Ms. A may be the perfect person for the job, but I was taken aback by the tone of the article, which read more like a weekly newspaper's story than a JG story.

I don't consider commenting on a writer's story a personal attack. If that's the case, I've been personally attacked more times than I can count.

Anonymous said...

Welcome back Tic Toc. We can always count on you to not be able to read the title of the thread discussion.

Anonymous said...

When did Soiree close? I heard music coming from there last weekend. Did they not open this week?

Does this not bode well for the Motown Speed plans?

As for serving what every one else serves, I welcomed the opportunity for fine dining from time to time and I loved that they had live, local entertainment.

Anonymous said...

It was impressive, not to mention refreshing, to read how open Miles Adkins was about the questions posed to him about his wife's hiring. At the end of the day, this is the kind of behavior that dispels suspicion and maintains trust. Sadly, it is behavior that we haven't seen much of in the past in this town. But now it is the kind of behavior that is demanded by the public. When officials go into hiding, we're going to speculate and imagine the worst. When they go public and speak frankly and on the record, we all rest easier.

Anonymous said...

This is to the 8:41 pm moron who apparently can't read. Go back, El Estupido (a/k/a mayor's lapdog), and read the article again - if you can. Here. I even copied it here for you. Go get a dictionary or better yet, your mommy, and read this carefully, then post a comment if you still have more questions.


"He said the role of a consultant is not to “train Atkins” as one Report reader suggested. Instead, he said, a consultant will help strengthen some of the MDC’s weaknesses in general."

Anonymous said...

Just read somewhere earlier in the comments that the MDC was operating all these years WITHOUT BYLAWS???! Did I understand that right??? What the hell? Somebody correct me if I'm wrong, but have we been giving tax dollars to an organization that didn't even have bylaws? And where the hell was Wayne Frick during all that? What about his buddy, Bill Thunberg who owns a business downtown and has been on that MDC board for years and years? Did HE ever speak up about this ridiculous fact? What a friggin' mess!

Anonymous said...

“A fellow with the inventiveness of Albert Einstein but with the attention span of Daffy Duck.”

Tom Shales

Anonymous said...

12:31 I think that the article stated that the bylaws were amended and approved in June 2008 not that there were never any in place.

Anonymous said...

Kim Atkins is still the wrong person for that position. She is too controversial and she will only serve those favorites in downtown. Like Frick, I bet money she will never darken the doors of many downtown businesses. She will never serve all of downtown only those who kiss her butt.

The politics in this town are so crooked. Who in this town can consider the Atkins family outsiders now that they have joined the Good Old Boys sucking the lifeblood out of this community?

It seems the Good Ole Boys Amons and Holshouser patted the back of one of their newly well trained Good Old Girls and made brownie points with a town commissioner by coming up with this whole sinister plot to hire Kim Atkins as Executive Director of the MDC. Rather slick tactic.

Anonymous said...

10:39 am:

I, too, read the post at "October 13, 2008 3:37 PM" which said "They (MDC bylaws) were amended because the downtown commission had operated for all these years without officially adopting them.They were adopted finally when Kim Atkins became chairman and realized that the commission was operating without them."

so, the question is whether this poster is right or not.


and 11:37 am: I was intrigued by the words you chose, such as:

"will only serve those favorites in downtown"

"will never darken the doors of many downtown businesses"

"will never serve all of downtown only those who kiss butt"

"the Good Old Boys sucking the lifeblood out of this community"

I was intrigued because while you were projecting these thoughts on to Mrs. Atkins, you were actually describing in full detail how things were while the former director, Wayne Frick, was placed "in charge" of downtown by his friends and managed to keep his position despite pervasive incompetence.

Of course time will tell about Mrs. Atkins as well, but as of this moment, there is no evidence that what occurred with Mr. Frick will occur with Mrs. Atkins.

It is gratifying, however, to know that you understood the truth of things during Frick's era. It is unfortunate and puzzling, however, that you apparently never chose to speak out against Frick in the face of actual proof, when you do not hesitate to speak out despite lack of that proof with Mrs. Atkins.

Anonymous said...

What I don't get is why the mayor and commissioner Rader are so dead set against Kim Atkins becoming the director of the Downtown Commissioner. Can somebody please explain?

Anonymous said...

Read something in the Tribune today that told me some politicians are starting to get it.

A guy running for county commission (Mark Vanek) said to the paper "he's heard a lot from voters on the campaign trail, particularly about...recent worries over how money was spent by Mooresville's Cops for Kids organization and the money previously owed to Mooresville by the South Iredell Community Development Corporation (SIDCD)...Voters, said Vanek, are concerned with how the area's candidates will handle situations like those while in office. There's alot of distrust there." Yep. You can say that again.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps the mayor and Rader feel that it is not an effective use of tax money. The MDC is funded mainly from two sources. The first is an additional tax placed on all properties in the 'Downtown district'. This is paid by the property owners and of course has to be absorbed either though their business or passed along to a tenant in the form of higher rent. The second, I think it's $50,000 per year presently, is paid from the General Fund for the Town which of course is the tax all the citizens of Mooresville pay in tax to the Town. Do you feel as a citizen you're getting your money's worth from the Downtown Commission? Do you see $100,000+ of improvements occuring in Downtown? Perhaps the mayor and Rader have a point.

Burdening the property downtown property owners with an additional tax has always seemed counter-productive to me. Why tax the people that are already struggling? Perhaps the Town shown poll the downtown property owners to see how they feel. I'm guessing most would vote to recind the downtown tax which would reduce their expenses. Then the $50,000 the Town puts in each year could go to other uses.

Amons has already admitted they have a very limited budget. Approximately 70% of that is spent on the director's salary, benefits, retirement, office expense etc. That does not leave much to be spent for promoting downtown.

I just wonder if the MDC consulted with other Towns and organizations to see what they are doing. We aren't the first to face this problem but it certainly seems that what we have been doing hasn't been working. Maybe a new director can make a difference but maybe that's not the best way to tackle this problem. Maybe the MDC should be looking for new innovative solutions.

Anonymous said...

October 13, 2008 7:48 PM
October 13, 2008 10:53 PM and
October 14, 2008 1:50 PM

Yeah, you! Go back & tell your pupeteer, the crash-and-burning mayor, that his little plan to smear his nemesis backfired.

We could write the book on this. Thunberg is and always has been a Lover of Crooks in Mooresville. Atkins stands up to corruption displeasing Thunberg. Thunberg begins to look for ways to retaliate against Atkins. Atkins wife applies for a downtown job. Thunberg sees his opportunity and sics his lapdogs on her to punish Atkins. But wait! The entire scheme blows up in his face when it fails miserably and finally exposes him and his accomplices. When will this loser learn? As long as he's out there to collect power and control he's going to get kicked in the ass - over and over and over again.

Anonymous said...

2:32, you're telling us that "Perhaps the mayor and Rader feel that it is not an effective use of tax money." That’s an interesting theory except that Bill Thunberg had no problem supporting the funding of this position while his errand boy Wayne Frick held it. The instant Frick left (you can go back & read the articles about this very early in the Gatton Report) all of a sudden Thunberg and his few cronies started himhawing about it. Why? Because they knew there was no errand boy like Frick who would do only their bidding and leave the rest of us storeowners out in the cold!

Anonymous said...

Would any of you complainers like to be the MDC Director? If not, shut up!

Anonymous said...

Hey 4:52. Maybe part of your problem is that you don't want to listen to anyone else. And I do believe part of the MDC budget is my tax money so I kinda feel like I am entitled to an opinion. Maybe you would like to say please or thank you now.

Anonymous said...

"Perhaps the mayor and Rader feel that it is not an effective use of tax money." That’s RICH! Those two turkeys all of a sudden thinking about “effective use of tax money.” That is just so hilarious I am at a loss for words!

Anonymous said...

O.K. 5:13. I'm sorry. Let me rephrase. Does anyone know of a more qualified candidate? Please let the MDC know if you do. If not, please shut up. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

Dear 2:49 PM, I'm shocked that you did indeed attribute all 3 comments to one person. That means you must be Jaime posting on here, because Jaime is the only one who would have IP addresses for the posts. In any regard, I am no friend of the mayor. He should be gone too. Hope that makes you feel better. :-)

Anonymous said...

To:
Does anyone know of a more qualified candidate? Please let the MDC know if you do.----

How about guys that ran the Soiree? Opps they only meet 2 of the three criteria:

---Out of a job
---Failure in business
---Spouse of a Town Board Member

If the previous poster is correct and 70% of downtown commission money goes to an executive, then this is a position that should be cut.

What a waste of tax dollars.....

Anonymous said...

Most of you people think you know so much. You don't know crap unless you've been there. It's easy to sit at your computer and be critical. If you had any understanding of how laws, policies, procedures, and ordinances work, you would think long and hard before typing useless material. Why don't you know-it-alls come forward and be active in the community. Run for office. Get on committees. Work for this town instead of hiding behind your computer.

Anonymous said...

I think I'll pass but thank you. When you lay down with dogs, you get fleas. I don't like fleas. They're itchy and gross.

Anonymous said...

Regardless of your opinion of Atkins, how about let's drop the ugly remarks about entrepeneurs who have put their blood, sweat, money and tears into innovative businesses and tried to succeed in environments dominated by large national chains. For all of those who talk about sitting on the sidelines in these political discussions instead of running for office, it is an even bigger challenge to start and try to run your own business. There is no dishonor, particularly in this economy, of someone having started a business and not being able to succeed due to a variety of factors, some within control and some not.

Anonymous said...

Dear 9:25, let me ask you a question. If you were the president of a college or university, would you hire someone to teach medicine that had lost their license to practice medicine? Would you hire someone to teach law who had been disbarred? Need I go on? Why hire someone who had failed at the very thing they are supposed to help or teach others about?

Well, I suppose if they were the chairman of the Board and also married to a commissioner, then we have our answer.

Anonymous said...

I'll second that, 9:25. I haven't been one of the ones posting the comments but I totally agree that some things just plain cross the line.

Anonymous said...

I really hope that you're the only person in the world that thinks like you 9:55. If a person loses their medical license it's because of malpractice or negligence or something.If a lawyer is disbarred, its because he did something unethical.....not because of a hit in the economy.You're seriously heartless and rude and you should be ashamed of yourself for drawing such a parallel.

Anonymous said...

Dear 10 pM, you are totally right. We should all feel sorry for Mrs. Atkins and go ahead and pay her big money because her business failed. How heartless of me. You are right that the taxpayers of Mooresville should be obligated to hire any family members of current elected officials who have lost their business and need a job.

For being so heartless, I apologize.

Anonymous said...

I will stand in judgment of Mrs. Atkins after she's had some time to work as the new director.

Anonymous said...

What a stupid thought process -- the MDC hired her because her business failed and they feel sorry for her. So all those smart, intelligent business owners are now a charity group and have been bamboozled by the nefarious and ever-growing conspiracy of the Atkins.

Does it look good -- no -- but is it illegal, unethical, immoral, or a violation of policy -- no. It's just sour grapes on your part.

Anonymous said...

October 15, 2008 2:32 PM, you wrote something that either shows that you have no clue or that you are intentionally trying to insult the intelligence of anyone who read your comment. You wrote "Perhaps the mayor and Rader feel that it is not an effective use of tax money."

Rader voted to approve the ridiculous town budget this year. He voted to give himself a raise. He voted for giving an extra 12.5 million dollars for the cable deal (on top of the 70 mil). He’s voted in support of CH2M Hill each and every time. He didn't blink when Erskine Smith tried to sneak the Cops For Kids program into the general budget, even kept supporting that shady move for months. The list goes on. His taxing and spending style is equaled by none. But now we’re supposed to believe he’s going to suddenly turn fiscally responsible when it comes to a position for director of downtown commission? Give me a break.

Anonymous said...

For Release: May 20, 2003
FTC and States Unite to Fight Fundraising Fraud


The Federal Trade Commission today announced "Operation Phoney Philanthropy" - a law enforcement and public education campaign by the FTC and state charities regulators to stop fraudulent fundraising. Fraudulent solicitors prey on the good will of donors and misrepresent who they are and what they do with the money they raise. They often pick the most popular charitable causes - support for police or firefighters and their families, veterans, and terminally ill children - to finagle funds from sympathetic and community-minded individuals. "By diverting donors' charitable dollars, these scam artists undermine the public's confidence in legitimate charitable fundraising, and injure legitimate nonprofit organizations that are competing for charity dollars," said Howard Beales, Director of the Federal Trade Commission's Bureau of Consumer Protection.

The FTC has filed five actions targeting companies and individuals that allegedly used deception to exploit well-intentioned individuals and businesses. In addition to the FTC cases, 34 states are joining in "Operation Phoney Philanthropy" by announcing law enforcement actions, consumer education or new legislation. "Making a donation to charity is an important way for many of us to give back to our communities,"

said North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper. "Unfortunately, some scammers try to take advantage of consumers' willingness to help those in need. We're keeping a vigilant eye out for these shameless rip-off artists."

ARE YOU NOW? WTF??? WHEN??? WHERE??? HOW??? WHO???

Who do you have doing the watching, Cooper?

Crone? Redmond? or Frank?

They watched, they learned, they did.

Great job Eagle Eye Cooper, glad your on top of things, dont know what the good people of Mooresville would have ever done without you.

I thought it was Lady Justice that was supposed to be blind.

Anonymous said...

Everyone relax. Kim Atkins has got to be better than Wayne Frick.

Anonymous said...

Tamara Bell

The FTC alleges that defendant Tamara Bell created six nonprofit corporations - American Veterans' Council, Inc.; Children's AIDS Council, Inc.; Children's Relief Services, Inc.; Disabled Children's Charity, Inc.; Firefighters' Assistance Foundation, Inc.; and Police and Sheriffs' Support Fund, Inc. - to use as vehicles for soliciting donations from consumers. According to the FTC, the Anaheim, California-based corporations are sham nonprofits created and controlled by unscrupulous fundraisers for their personal profit. While appearing on paper to be legitimate nonprofit organizations, in reality each of these corporations did little more than provide for-profit fundraisers with solicitation materials falsely touting nonexistent good work and a bank account in which to cash donation checks. According to the FTC, in their telephone solicitation scripts and in their brochures, the defendants made specific claims such as the American Veterans' Council has a scholarship/grant program to help veterans and their immediate families to become better educated, and the Disabled Children's Charity provides needy children with medical equipment such as braces and wheelchairs, when in fact the nonprofits undertook none of the described specific programs.

The FTC's complaint alleges that, in the course of conducting business, both Bell and the six entities misrepresent that: donations will go to a legitimate charitable organization; contributions will support programs in the donor's local community or will support particular programs; and donations to the entities are tax deductible. The complaint also alleges that Bell provided the means and instrumentalities for others to commit fraud.

To settle the FTC's charges, the corporate defendants are banned from telemarketing. The settlement futher prohibits Tamara Bell, in connection with soliciting contributions via telemarketing, from making material misrepresentations about how or where a donation will be used, and that a donation will be tax deductible. If Bell engages in telemarketing solicitation in the future, the settlement requires her to: (1) disclose how the contributions will be used for charitable purposes; (2) disclose that the solicitor is a professional fundraiser; and (3) disclose the city and state of the nonprofit's principal place of business. In addition, she must possess documents substantiating any claims made about charitable program services. The settlement contains a $100,000 suspended judgment, with an avalanche clause that allows the FTC to reopen the case if it is found that Bell made material misrepresentations about her financial condition. (Complaint and stipulated permanent injunction filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Southern Division. FTC File No. 022-3306; Civil Action No. not available at press time. FTC staff contact: Tracy Thorleifson - Northwest Region - Seattle, 206-220-6350.)

Anonymous said...

I was hoping we would do much better than just 'better than Wayne Frick'. There was an opportunity to take a giant step forward but it appears the MDC blew it.

Someone said if there was a better choice, we should bring them forward. Unfortunately, we did not have access to the resumes that were submitted or the resources available to the MDC. We put our trust in the Board members to make the best selection. As we have learned recently in the news regarding United Way, board members, even highly regarded board members, do not always live up to the level of trust put in them by the public.

Perhaps the MDC would be willing to share the resumes of the people that they did interview. That would help clear the air and should illustrate why Atkins was such a clear choice; "head and shoulders above the others" if I'm not mistaken.

Also, I would imagine that Atkins outlined her program to revitalize downtown. Perhaps sharing that would help rebuild the faith and trust of the citizens.

And, please, don't tell me to shut up again but I'm afraid that's the most intelligent thing you are capable of thinking of.

Anonymous said...

Calls seeking donations for local police a scam, sheriff's office says
— By James Monteleone— The Daily Times
Article Launched: 10/03/2008 12:00:00 AM MDT

SAN JUAN COUNTY — Many residents have reported receiving phone calls in recent weeks requesting donations to help their local Sheriff's Office buy bulletproof vests. Those calls are fraudulent, authorities warn.

Residents who reported receiving the calls recounted solicitors asking for $25 for needed police equipment, in some cases offering to come to the resident's home to pick up the money.

The San Juan County Sheriff's Office is warning residents about the potential scam, reassuring that its office is well equipped and fully funded by the county budget.

West Hammond resident Sandy Barnes said he received the prank call Wednesday night, but when he started asking questions, the caller hung up.

"He actually told me he was a deputy, but he wouldn't tell me what department," Barnes said. "They want to buy them vests, and all that kind of stuff, which is bogus. ... People need to be warned about them, because they're not legitimate at all."

In other reported incidents, solicitors have claimed to work for a private,
Advertisement
out-of-state organization hired by the local sheriff for fundraising, Sheriff's Lt. Tyler Truby said.

Calls are reported to come from unknown numbers and appear to be randomly dialed.

"All of a sudden we've started hearing about it more and more," he said. "We want to let people know that this isn't being sanctioned by the Sheriff's Office."

Contrary to the phone solicitors' claims, the Sheriff's Office is appropriately equipped, with each deputy issued a bulletproof vest and all other necessary equipment, Truby said.

"We are a very professional organization ... We protect the people that work for us," he said. "Our bulletproof vests and our equipment comes form the (San Juan County) general fund, and we don't solicit."

Recounting his questionable phone call, Barnes said he's concerned others might be lured to give money.

"I can't imagine anyone falling for their scams, but I know people do because they think they're helping a cop some place," he said. "The cops over here don't do that. They don't go out calling people for money."

"We're curious who it is. If anyone has any information, we ask that they give us a call," Truby said.

Anyone who has received a call requesting donations for local police departments or with other information about the solicitation can contact the San Juan County Sheriff's Office at (505) 334-6107.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps its ex chief Sheriff RedCrones crew, someone should call that number and tell them they are branching out AND wearing badges while the do it to boot

Great idea guys, you families must be very proud.

Anonymous said...

Most of the charitable event calls that we receive come from TBS Productions... here's the record from the California Attorney General's office for 2002:

Charity/Charitable Purpose Commercial Fundraiser Activity Total Revenue To Charity % To Charity
Oakland Police Officers Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 412,066.00 90,895.84 22.06
San Francisco Police Officers Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 431,837.00 90,459.25 20.95
Alameda County Deputy Sheriffs Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 424,207.00 88,551.75 20.87
Santa Clara County Police Officers Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 410,681.00 85,170.25 20.74
San Mateo Police Officers Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 310,271.00 62,054.20 20.00
Santa Cruz Police Officers Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 119,026.00 23,805.20 20.00
Bakersfield Police Officers Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 242,523.00 48,504.60 20.00
Bakersfield Firemen's Relief Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 181,659.00 36,331.80 20.00
San Jose Firefighters Burn Foundation TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 309,168.00 61,833.60 20.00
Fresno County Firefighters Local 1180 TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 142,864.00 28,572.80 20.00
Fresno Deputy Sheriffs Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 151,822.00 30,364.40 20.00
San Mateo County Deputy Sheriffs Association TBS PRODUCTIONS Family Variety Show 409,847.00 81,969.40 20.00
Correctional Peace Officers Foundation TBS PRODUCTIONS Benefit Magic Show 288,480.00 43,272.00 15.00
San Francisco Firefighters Charitable Fund TBS PRODUCTIONS Benefit Basketball Classic 218,457.00 32,768.55 15.00
Firefighters Charitable Foundation TBS PRODUCTIONS Grand National Rodeo 769,682.00 115,452.30 15.00
Deputy Sheriffs Association of Santa Clara County TBS PRODUCTIONS Basketball Classic 418,512.00 87,128.00 20.82
Santa Cruz City Firefighters Local 1716 TBS PRODUCTIONS Benefit Basketball Game 155,129.00 31,025.80 20.00

Anonymous said...

Ex-Calif. Bay Area Chief Indicted for "Sham Charities"

A former Santa Clara County Sheriffs Lieutenant and ex-union president was indicted August 2 for trading on the union's name to raise funds for sham charities.

According to the indictment by a Santa Clara grand jury, Armand Tiano and 12 alleged co-conspirators engaged in grand theft, tax evasion and money laundering that involved at least $1.4 million. Among the false charities were two created after the 1998 slaying of Millbrae police officer David Chetcuti. Allegedly, Tiano and the others persuaded many people to write checks for the "Officer Chetcuti Fund" and the "Millbrae Officer Family Trust Fund." The widow, Gail Chetcuti, never received any of those funds.

In his heyday, Tiano oversaw the county jails, presided over the Santa Clara Deputy Sheriffs Association and twice campaigned for Sheriff. In 1993, Tiano incorporated his own fund-raising group, the Deputy Sheriiffs' Sports Association, and contracted with two brothers, George and Matthew Kellner, who already owed the union $100,000 in charity fund-raising. The brothers then began paying off Tiano from the ostensible charity to take advantage of "his official position and contacts" acc. to the indictment.

For the next five years, Tiano and the Kellners raised funds by phone for various groups claiming police affiliation, even though Tiano, who retired in 1996, was the only police officer in these groups. California law requires any non-govt. organization with "police" in its name to have current or retired police comprising at least 80 percent of its membership.

In 1998, a local attorney contacted county prosecutors after his client agreed to make a $100 credit card donation to the "Santa Clara County Deputy Sheriff's Office," then later found eight charges totaling $800 to a similarly named group using Tiano's home address. Tiano denied any wrong-doing and offered a list of food banks, shelters, churches and athletic teams that had benefited from his operations. But when the Santa Clara District Attorney’s office contacted 13 of the charities, only one said it had ever received any funds from Tiano's groups -- $1,000.

Tiano agreed to register his group with the state Attorney General's Office of Charitable Trusts. After he failed to do so, prosecutors ordered him to cease his telemarketing operations in February 2000. But three days later, Tiano formed the "Police and Sherriff's Athletic League and Community Fund" and persisted in raising money, according to the indictment.

Anonymous said...

gee I wonder how many victims there are in Mooresville and Iredell County


The Eau Claire County district attorney's office and the Wisconsin attorney general are jointly prosecuting a racketeering case that goes to trial in September. It's one of the few criminal cases in the country over alleged telemarketing fraud for charity.

The original complaint came through the Eau Claire Police Department from a former employee of a Wisconsin-based telemarketing firm. The Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection sent an undercover investigator to work for the telemarketer.

Investigators charged the accused ringleader, Duane J. Kolve, with four counts of racketeering on suspicion of inventing two fake charities and deceiving donors when soliciting for legitimate charities. All told, the scam netted $10 million from 443,000 individuals, according to prosecutors.

Anonymous said...

and someone here wants to keep the focus on this womans job

Good luck to you Mrs. Atkins, I'm sure your going to be great at it.

Now was there a meeting last night or not?

Anything new happen?

Anonymous said...

Tic Toc, nobody cares what happened in California 5 or 6 years ago. This is North Carolina. Take your meds buddy. Your obsession is getting the best of you. AGain, read the title of the thread. What nobody talking to you on the other threads? We've moved on.

Anonymous said...

No one is moving on if I can help it, its about fundraising fraud period.

You think you are running shit, your a waste of perfectly water.

Mrs Atkins is not the issue, corruption in the Mooresville Police department is the issue, now do like you were told and run back to the mayor , jamie is not the only one with ip logs Einstein

and you need to stop calling me tic-toc

Anonymous said...

Jaimie,
Is there anyway to block this guys email from coming in/ Give us a break will you T.C.

Anonymous said...

Tic Toc, your obsession is becoming the laughing stock of the Gatton Report. If anyone wants to discuss the police, they will do so in the thread with that title. This is about Mrs. Atkins.

Get a life Tic Toc.

Anonymous said...

I did not think you had it in you.

I guess I made you mad

But they are going to forget, quick, I dont know who TC is, but he has some power

Anonymous said...

Your right in one respect in that it is about North Carolina and the laws she has enacted. As well as the laws that these criminals violated, but more specifically, it is about this law in particular.

N.C.G.S. § 14-100(a)(2003). Our Supreme Court has interpreted G.S. § 14-100(a) as consisting of the following elements: “'(1) a false representation of a subsisting fact or a future fulfillment or event, (2) which is calculated and intended to deceive, (3) which does in fact deceive, and (4) by which one person obtains or attempts to obtain value from another.'” State v. Parker, 354 N.C. 268, 284, 553 S.E.2d 885, 897 (2001) (quoting State v. Cronin, 299 N.C. 229, 242, 262 S.E.2d 277, 286 (1980)). The language of G.S. § 14-100(a) covers “any kind of false pretense whatsoever.” Thus, the representation which constitutes the false pretense “need not come through spoken words, but instead may be by act or conduct.” Parker, 354 N.C. at 284, 553 S.E.2d at 897.


It is about them violating this law inperticular hundreds and hundreds of times, if not thousands, it is about these people being CLASS H and C Felons awaiting the formality of a trial, and it is about them being alowed to continue walking the streets and about them not being treated as others in the state of North Carolina have been treated in similar circumstances.

But even more then that, it is about what is right and wrong and I just dont see where Mrs. Atkins fits into all that, nor do I care to find out right now, the violations before the legal system right now deal with being a complete and total fraud commited by many members of law enforcement under the color of authority. And how you can justify to yourself that this woman's job is paramount to that is just beyond me, unless of course you are aware of the fact that the attention span of a group wears out with time and by diverting the focus to something much more trivial to keep people talking about that then they cant possible be thinking and talking about the really important shit right now can they?

What can you possible be thinking in that hat stand you call a head I cant possible imagine.




Blocking me will last less then a second. Nice try though.

Anonymous said...

Chiiirp chiiirp. Tic Toc go away. Your time has come and passed.

Time Traveler

Anonymous said...

2:52 - Maybe it's not your post themselves. They are obviously copied and pasted with great care and attention. You're not using real scissors I hope. I would be a little concerned about you having a sharp object in your hand. Were you liked by anyone at all in the 6th grade or have you always been just a little different?

Anonymous said...

and BTW, its not called blocking, its called censoring, blocking me will only make me mad and cause me to bypass that in a matter of seconds.

So next time you want to try to censor someone maybe you should just go burn some books.


Or maybe I am just keeping you here so you can attack me and leave everyone else alone to work, did you ever think about that smart guy?

Anonymous said...

They are obviously copied and pasted with great care and attention.

They must be if even you got the inferences I was making in regards to the similarities between RedCrone and the ex dumbass cops and sheriffs currently eating up 40,000 dollars a year of tax payer monies in prison.

Coincidentally, thats probably going to be the same prison RedCrone is going to as well.



“A bill of rights is what the people are entitled to against every government on earth, general or particular, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inferences”

Thomas Jefferson quotes

Anonymous said...

“Judges must beware of hard constructions and strained inferences, for there is no worse torture than that of laws.”

Francis Bacon, Sr. quotes

Anonymous said...

In case anyone is wondering, ALL the full text articles are for this.......




1.3 Teaching Statistical Inference Using Many Samples from a Real Large Dataset
The access to large real data bases allows a new use of simulation for the teaching of the statistics.
A data base is selected as population of reference within which one can extract as many samples as
necessary, according to given sampling process. Working on these sets of samples makes it possible
to preserve a part of the advantages of the purely simulated data, while working on realistic
samples.
For statistical education, this way of using simulation has new advantages:
- Using a real and finite population (all customers of a company, or all objects in a stock, or all
the accidents on a territory during one year), the concept sample is more understandable; the student
understands that each individual of the population (a person, an object, an accident) can, or not,
being randomly present in the sample.
- One can understand the meaning of each variable (age, sex, income, profession, weight, value,
hour of the day, place, )
- The meaning of “the parameter true value” or “the true hypothesis” is clear because we are able
to calculate the population parameter.
- Variables are not drawing from theoretical distribution; they are dissymetric, multimodal, and so
on, as they are in real life; their correlations are complex. Looking at his sample, each student has to
choose one or more models. It becomes aware that no modelling is exact, but that some are adapted
more than of others to solve a particular real problem; and also that certain modelling suggested are
too related to the sample available and lead to “over-fitting”.
So that the students understand well the concept of random sample resulting from the base of data,
my experiment shows that it is necessary to start with random samples from a population which
relates to them personally; a good manner would be to draw random samples from the list of the
students, using random numbers produced in situ with a pocket calculator, and then to write in the
blackboard the results of the estimates and/or tests. After that, one can automate the sampling
process.

Anonymous said...

chiirp chiirp

Time Traveler

Anonymous said...

Don't worry Tic-Toc. We haven't taken our eyez off the prize. Cops 4 Kids hasn't been forgotten and I for one am not offended by you bringing it back to our attention. Nobody on here seems to comment on the relevant posts so why should you follow rules that nobody else wants to follow? If somebody doesn't want to read your comments here they can just skip over them. Hey Time Traveler usually you don't sign your name to chirp chirp comments----is that you?

Anonymous said...

ouch , now your just being mean

This must be some kind of a joke, am I being punk'ed or is Allen Funt going to jump from the closet?

Thats it.... your the evil spawn of ashton kutchner and allen funt..... Your ashton funt are'nt you?

Can I get your autograph? I bet I could sell it on ebay for a penny,

hey REDCRONE why dont I then give that penny to you, and the two of you can put the same penny on ebay, call it a copper engraved bust of Aberham Lincoln, and sell it for the low low price of 19.95

come on now, I know you want too

Anonymous said...

Dear 4:48, do your thought processes actually work that way? You are talking jibberish.

Anonymous said...

I'TS another fraud jackass, are you really this slow, someone give this dude some Ritalin please.

Anonymous said...

Tic Toc, read your post.... you ramble and are incoherent.

Anonymous said...

Lets see,

Incoherent and rambling

Ouch, your just being mean is a reference to the comment in which you signed the name Time Traveler, so I said, that this must be a joke, meaning some sort of practical joke as no one can be as dumb as you appear to be, the joke would be similar to a practical joke as practiced by both Punk'ed and Candid Camera, the hosts of both shows are ashton kutchner and allen funt.

Combine those two and you get ashton funt....in other words....You are a combination of the two, thus the evil spawn, comment.

Now if I were to meet either of those two comedians I would want their autograph, so I asked you for yours, the spawn of allen funt and ashton kutchner.


Are you with me so far Bambi???


Once I got your autograph I would sell it on ebay for a penny, give that penny to RedCrone and their kind and since they like fraud so much, I decided to remind them of a story line from a movie where the criminal was charged with selling pennies for 19.95. I think it was dumb and dumber, so tell me now princess, which of those two do you want to be today?


Now what part of that is incoherent LOL

I would say I tied it together quite nicely, wouldn't you?

The comedy of Dennis Miller would be lost on you, I can see that now, before I joke again, I will make sure to dumb it down for you.

Anonymous said...

This is THE Time Traveler. This is the first post I have made on this thread. The posts at:

October 16, 2008 3:09 PM
October 16, 2008 3:58 PM

were not made by me. I haven't had much knowledge of the current thread and have been keeping up but not posting.

Apparently those who are on here to cause disruptions and distractions from the original purpose of this BLOG are stooping to new lows.

I can't think of anything more cowardly and childish than posting under someone elses name just to cause problems. I thought being totally anonymous without even having a screen name was bad enough. At least some of us have a screen name so our posts can be tied together.

Jamie, you must be hitting a major nerve. These jackasses are getting desperate. Only people with alot to lose would spend so much time and energy to try to turn the good guys against each other.

Time Traveler

Anonymous said...

By the way, I enjoy the hell out of the RedCrone remarks. I personally find that highly amusing.

Time Traveler

Anonymous said...

We're losing a landmark, Tarheel Hardware is closing the doors.

Anonymous said...

Allen Funt? Careful there you're showing your age T.C.

Anonymous said...

Time Traveler, you have no idea how close you are to the truth when you said "These jackasses are getting desperate. Only people with alot to lose would spend so much time and energy to try to turn the good guys against each other." I cannot divulge who I am, but I can tell you this. There are people in this town and nearby areas who are not sleeping at night because of what they know is coming. The spark that began in Mooresville is spreading. Be prepared to see some very nasty and desperate "tricks". You're all dealing with some very, very slow learners here.

Anonymous said...

Think about this.

Soiree - closed
Garden Secret - closed
Little Kitchen - closed
Tarheel Hardware - closing

My God, Wayne Frick was the glue holding Downtown together. Can we get him back? Michael Jordan came back. Bret Farve came back.
Dale Earnhardt has been spotted by many people. Let's get Wayne back ! ! !

Anonymous said...

Actually, you are showing your age, why do you think I left out Peter Funt, Dumbass

When will you ever learn

YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT! USE IT!

Anonymous said...

9:43... I am well aware of how truthful that statement was. As far as desperate and nasty tricks, it can only make things worse for them. At some point it is a good idea to quit making enemies and gracefully step down.

There is a driven force and momentum behind this whole thing now. It used to be that you could get to one person and quiet things down.

Now there have been connections made. There are pockets of people who will stand up for each other if things get nasty. It will just be more actions to add to the list of misconduct already occured.

Anonymous said...

I actually think the good side would welcome a "desperate and nasty" move at the moment. Any further misconduct will only fuel the fire of those demanding change. It has been shown that there is a group here that won't back down.

Those of this group who have remained anonymous, would have no reason to remain anonymous once they have had some bullshit pulled on them. That would only add to the list of people who are openly vocal.

As I said, there is a time to back down gracefully and hope the public is forgiving.

Anonymous said...

Mrs. Atkins is quite happy to have the focus taken off of her, but we're not being fooled. What types of jobs will the taxpayers fund for the other business owners as their businesses fail?

Anonymous said...

This is what they tried to do, its long but it will be a good refresher course for the FBI and SBI. The crooks RedCrone should have read it, but alas they are just not that bright.

Guess who HAS read it though?

Who do you think knows it very well?

They are all going to prison, no doubt about it, show this case to Mitch Gold, he'll tell you the same thing I am, I promise.

The case with Kolve and 443,000 victims in WI, was one of Gold's Capo's, he'll tell you the same thing we will as well.


Read for yourself, what they did is Organized Crime.

ENJOY!




Telemarketing Machine Pulls in Millions While Its Inventor Does Time in Prison
By Ronald Campbell, The Orange County Register, Calif.

Mar. 12--Charity was sweet for Mitch Gold.

Before prosecutors finally caught up with the king of Orange County telemarketing, the 5-foot-11-inch, 264-pound Gold ate several times a week at Ruth's Chris Steak House, drove a Jaguar (license plate "Sir Gold") and kept a Ferrari Testarossa in the garage of his hilltop San Juan Capistrano home.

Donations, $25 or $35 at a time, harvested from hundreds of thousands of people, helped pay for it all.

Charity regulators around the country cheered in July 2002 when a federal judge sentenced Gold to eight years in prison for fraud.

Before his sentencing, Virginia regulator Jo Freeman gave the judge a list of Gold's charities and solicitors. Her list filled eight single-spaced pages.

Handing Gold a long sentence, Freeman wrote, "will be sending a strong message to the rest of his network."

She was wrong.

In the first four years since Gold fled the business in late 2000, an Orange County Register investigation found former clients, employees and subcontractors raised nearly $83 million in the name of charities such as the American Deputy Sheriffs' Association, the Association for Disabled Firefighters and the Junior Police Academy.

Total kept by fundraisers and charity executives: $76.7 million.

Total spent on good works: $5.7 million -- 7 cents for every donated dollar.

Typical charities spend 85 cents of every dollar raised on programs, according to a Register analysis of more than 150,000 nonprofit tax returns nationwide.

Gold and his students turned traditional charity upside down. They exploited a legal vacuum that lets charitable solicitors say almost anything to raise money for client charities that devote almost nothing to programs and services.

Gold's students are making more money than he did, spending even less on charity and, with few exceptions, avoiding the official scrutiny that landed their teacher in prison. Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the federal government has stripped resources from investigations of white-collar crime. That has opened the door for dubious charities to raise more money than ever.

"They're taking money away" from other charities, said Daniel Borochoff, president of the American Institute of Philanthropy, a group that monitors nonprofits.

This is the story of Mitch Gold's network -- how he built it and why it continues to flourish without him. The Register pieced the story together from nearly 10,000 pages of public documents and dozens of interviews with regulators, victims and telemarketing insiders. Gold agreed to be interviewed in prison and then canceled. Most of his former associates declined to be interviewed.

Gold founded his fundraising empire in Orange County in 1987 after he went bankrupt franchising T-shirt shops.

At the time Orange County was just beginning to earn a national reputation as the "Cote du Fraud" (French for "Coast of Fraud") a fetid Petri dish for crooked banks, phony investments and prize scams. The county was notorious enough to earn the starring role in a 1990 congressional hearing on fraud.

It would take charity cops years to figure out how to attack Gold. By the time they did, he had built a money machine, reaping $10 million a year through 84 subcontractors for two dozen charities in at least 28 states.

When Gold went to prison, his money machine chugged along without him.

Ex-convict Joe Shambaugh, one of Gold's legal advisers, set up shop as a charity administrator. Until last summer, he managed four closely linked charities from a rundown office in Santa Ana. The Shambaugh charities raised $16 million from 2001 through 2004. They spent about 1 cent on the dollar for charitable projects.

Robert M. Friend Jr., who had formed one of Gold's last big charity clients in May 1999, spun off four charities that raised $8 million. Amount spent on charitable works: 8 cents on the dollar.

Former Gold clients David Dierks and Phil LeConte raised $26 million for three police charities. They spent 13 cents on the dollar for programs. Dierks and LeConte paid themselves $1.1 million.

Most of the money donated to these charities actually went to the fundraisers, many of whom once worked for Gold.

Take Wisconsin fundraiser Duane Kolve, who wrote to Judge David O. Carter vouching for Gold's good character. Kolve earned more than $8 million from Shambaugh and other former Gold associates. Three years ago, Kolve raised $118,000 for the Association for Firefighters & Paramedics, a Santa Ana group run by former Gold associate Michael Gamboa. The charity's share was 10 cents on the dollar.

"Maybe he didn't have a seminar, 'How to Run a Charity Scam,'" said Assistant U.S. Attorney Ellyn Lindsay, Gold's federal prosecutor. But "he was teaching others."

Gold's fundraising students have flourished by sticking to a formula he perfected. The first step is to find a small, struggling charity or create one with an appealing name.

Next fundraisers tie that name to one of a litany of causes, often ripped from the day's headlines: wheelchairs for children, bulletproof vests for cops, death benefits for widows.

And when the money rolls in, the fundraisers send the charity just enough cash to keep most regulators at bay.

Gold was partial to charities with veterans, firefighters, cops or children in their names. Of 24 charities that he represented in the late 1990s, 22 traded on one of these causes. Among them: American Veterans Network, American Veterans Relief Fund and Help Hospitalized Veterans. His followers have stuck to that strategy.

Former aide Shambaugh managed the Association for Disabled Firefighters and the Disabled Firefighters Fund. Former Gold client Friend runs the Disabled Firefighters Foundation.

One doesn't have to create a charity from scratch to get an appealing name. It's easier to persuade an existing charity to simply register some attractive business names.

In May 2001, former Gold courier Adam Cohen signed a fundraising contract with Emmanuel Outreach Ministries, a nondenominational church in Fullerton. The contract listed a half-dozen business names for Emmanuel, including Hospitalized Children Fund, Help for the Homeless Program and Hear the Cry of the Children International.

Over the next two years Cohen raised $1.1 million nationwide. Emmanuel, which drew about 50 people to Sunday services, got $105,000, according to state reports.

Shiloh International Ministries, a former Gold client, had five business names, including Adolescent AIDS Foundation, American Veterans Network and Help Hospitalized Children Fund.

"The names were fantastic," said William Borland, a retired Pebble Beach stockbroker who sometimes got three calls a day from former Gold associates representing children, veterans and firefighters. "It was everything that touched the human heart."

Attractive names make Gold-style charity telemarketing possible. One-sided contracts make it lucrative.

A typical Gold-style contract guarantees a charity a set amount or a fixed percentage of the take -- seldom more than 15 percent and sometimes far less. On top of that, the fundraiser usually owns the donor list. This practice, condemned by charity watchdogs and some commercial fundraisers, effectively strips the charity of its independence. Without its own donor list, the charity is at the mercy of the fundraiser.

The formula is like a funhouse mirror version of traditional charity.

U.S. charities spent about 85 percent of their money on programs and less than 2 percent on fundraising from 1999 through 2003, according to the Register's data analysis of about 150,000 organizations provided by Guide-Star, a nonprofit charity tracker.

A tiny fraction of those charities -- about 500 groups nationwide -- spend more than 75 percent of their money on fundraising, the analysis found.

Why would any charity take such a one-sided deal?

"To us it was a good thing because we weren't having to, I guess, literally do anything," former American Deputy Sheriffs' Association president and Gold client Larry Smith testified in 2001.

David Tubbs, Shiloh's chief financial officer, said Gold's reputation didn't stop the organization from doing business with him.

"Even I knew that Mitch was a pretty bad character," Tubbs said. "But we needed the money."

Shiloh illustrates the colossal mismatch between donors' expectations and reality.

Based in an old bungalow in La Verne, Shiloh has depended on telemarketing for more than a decade. It solicited in 34 states in 2004. Its founder Wallace Christensen was ordained in the Universal Life Church -- the original "mail-order ministry."

Between 1997 and 2004, Gold and his successors raised $6 million for Shiloh. The solicitors took $4 million. Most of the rest went to overhead, including stipends for Christensen, Tubbs and other officers. The charity spent 9 cents on the dollar for grants to hospitals and individuals.

It delivered considerably less than the telemarketers' scripts suggested.

In a 1999 deposition, Federal Trade Commission attorney Tracy Thorleifson read portions of Shiloh's telemarketing scripts to Tubbs and asked him to explain what they meant.

Thorleifson: "'During the course of the year, as you know, we provide a number of special outings for the kids, such as amusement parks and professional baseball games." In what way does Shiloh through Handicapped Children's Services of America do these things?"

Tubbs: "In late '97 we provided two baseball tickets that were provided from Mitch's office to a Dodger game that we gave to the Foothill AIDS Project that they used to send someone to a ball game."

Thorleifson: "Two tickets?"

Tubbs: "Two."

That same year, Gold and other solicitors raised $356,000 in Shiloh's name. The fundraisers kept two-thirds of the money.

Two years ago, with Gold in prison, solicitors raised more than $500,000 for Shiloh. Former Gold subcontractor Tom Buchman and other fundraisers kept three-fourths of the money. Shiloh spent most of its share on overhead. It reported spending 6 cents on the dollar in contributions and aid to individuals.

Repeat donors are the mother lode of charity telemarketing, milled from thousands of cold calls like gold ore from gravel beds. They are known in the trade as "mooches."

Mildred Rockey was a mooch. Sometime after 2000, the 90-year-old Palos Verdes Estates widow suffered a series of small strokes. Her deterioration was so gradual that her family at first did not notice. But telemarketers working for former Gold associates Timothy Lyons, Jeff Atkins and Shambaugh quickly realized they'd found an open checkbook.

After her condition worsened, Rockey gave almost $45,000. She gave it $25 or $50 or $100 at a time, in checks slipped under her doormat for waiting couriers.

Couriers occupy the bottom rung in charity telemarketing. They appear at a donor's doorstep within hours or even minutes of a call, before the donor can change his or her mind.

Couriers were visiting Rockey once or twice a day before she exhausted her bank account. One even forged her signature on a check, misspelling her first name as "Mildrid."

"These guys are like sharks," her son John Rockey said. "They sense weakness."

William F. Borland outwardly has little in common with Mildred Rockey. He's a retired stockbroker in Pebble Beach, someone intimately familiar with the getting and keeping of money. But he, too, was a mooch -- a "golden mooch" who between 1999 and 2002 wrote $80,000 in checks to groups controlled by Gabriel Sanchez and other Gold successors.

"When I got three requests a day," Borland said, "I began to wonder. I'm sure the word was out: 'Hey, we got one here." They were damned good at what they did."

University of Tennessee sociologist Neal Shover has studied fraudulent telemarketers for years. He thinks they're interested in one thing: "life as party."

Shover and Glenn S. Coffey of the University of Northern Florida interviewed 45 telemarketers convicted of federal crimes.

They found people who earned $100,000 to $250,000 a year while working just 20 to 30 hours a week. That left plenty of time for "life as party."

"One subject said that they 'would go out to the casinos and blow two, three, four, five thousand dollars a night,'" Shover and Coffey wrote. "Asked how he spent the money he made in telemarketing, one subject replied, 'houses, girls, just going out to nightclubs and lots of blow [cocaine]... lots and lots of blow, enormous amounts.'"

Work itself could be life as party. On the job, many solicitors dressed casually, used drugs and alcohol and got a thrill as potent as any drug from a successful call.

For Mitch Gold, "life as party" required cool cars. His company paid $657.47 a month for his Jaguar. The company also paid for his $85,000 vintage Ferrari Testarossa.

His chief prot駩, J.P. Cohen, who went to prison with Gold, was a serious gambler. Tom Buchman, a former Gold subcontractor, said Cohen loved Pai Gow, an Asian form of poker, and would drop $50,000 a night.

Mitch Gold casually defied the law for a decade. Then he ran into a federal prosecutor named Ellyn Marcus Lindsay and the County of Orange Boiler Room Apprehension task force, a group of local and federal cops based in Santa Ana.

Lindsay and her COBRA team pinned felonies on Gold, J.P. Cohen and a handful of other Orange County fundraisers.

Their triumph was brief.

Gold was indicted Sept. 5, 2001. Six days later, as jetliners struck the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, COBRA shut its doors.

The dismantling of COBRA was a small act in a sweeping nationwide transformation of law enforcement that has left donors with few places to turn for help.

The FBI quickly shifted agents and money to terrorism. Scott Gicking, a COBRA task force member, was among 300 FBI agents reassigned from white-collar crime to terrorism.

In August 2004, the Government Accountability Office reported that the FBI referred 23 percent fewer white-collar cases to prosecutors in 2003 than it had in 2001 and opened 32 percent fewer investigations. The GAO said the data was inconclusive because other agencies such as the U.S. Postal Inspection Service and the Internal Revenue Service had stepped up investigations.

But unpublished GAO research released to The Register and reports by the Justice Department's inspector general suggest the shift in FBI priorities could hamper investigations of all but the biggest frauds.

"Nobody else can do the sophisticated, long-term white-collar crime investigations that the FBI does," three top agents in the FBI Financial Crimes Section told the GAO. "We have the largest number of white-collar crime agents of any law enforcement agency. We have specialized expertise."

A September 2005 report by the U.S. Justice Department inspector general warned of an "investigative gap" in federal efforts to combat telemarketing fraud. The FBI slashed the number of agents working telemarketing cases from 60 in 2000 to just 16 in 2004, the inspector general said. No other agency filled the gap left by the FBI.

Charities that willingly accept a few pennies on the dollar, and the fundraisers they hire, have charged through this gap. The nation's 500 least-efficient charities paid fundraisers a combined $276 million -- 88 cents of every dollar the charities spent -- in 2003, the last year for which complete records are available, according to The Register's analysis.

The charities spent just 8 cents on the dollar for the causes that donors thought they were supporting. The public gave these charities a combined $429 million in 2003 -- nearly $100 million more than the previous year.

Some of these charities are run by former Gold associates and clients like Robert Friend and Shiloh International Ministries.

But there's also the Association for Police and Sheriffs, an Anaheim group that raised almost $1 million and spent barely 2 cents on the dollar, to help battered women. There's the Firefighters Charitable Foundation of Westerly, R.I., which raised nearly $11 million while spending 12 cents on the dollar to assist fire and disaster victims. There's the Children's Charity Fund of Sarasota, Fla., which raised $1.2 million and spent 9 cents on the dollar assisting disabled children.

A few of those charities may have just had a bad year. But 150 of them, including the Association for Police and Sheriffs, spent most of their money on fundraisers three straight years.

"It's based on the market," said Lloyd Jones, president of the Association for Police and Sheriffs, which gets 10 cents of every dollar raised in its name. "The more you're established, the better the percentage."

But charity expert Putnam Barber, editor of the Internet Nonprofit Center in Seattle, said charities that consistently accept high-cost fundraising "are the froth on top of this sewer."

The courtroom war on dubious charities did not end Sept. 11, 2001. But the federal cutbacks raised the stakes for regulators and ultimately for donors.

Fewer FBI agents on the white-collar beat, fewer open investigations and fewer referrals to prosecutors boil down to this: Prosecutors must choose charity cases more carefully. And they have to be prepared to run a legal marathon.

It took Lindsay and the remnants of her COBRA team until November 2003, about five years, to nail onetime Gold client Gabriel Sanchez and his high school pal Timothy Lyons for a one-man church scam in Orange County.

Two other former Gold associates were charged in the past month after lengthy investigations. Former Gold apprentice Joe Shambaugh was indicted on federal fraud charges. He is now a fugitive. Onetime Gold subcontractor Duane Kolve was accused of criminal racketeering by Wisconsin prosecutors.

"There needs to be a more concerted effort to rein in and regulate charitable solicitation fraud," said Eau Claire County, Wis., District Attorney Richard White, who prosecuted Kolve. "If it's happening here, how many other places is it happening, and at what level?"

Lindsay had wanted to do more.

"I tried to get any investigators I could find to work charitable fraud, and I can't find an investigator," she said. "You have a willing prosecutor and nobody to investigate the crime. It's depressing."

Anonymous said...

I'd like to hear about the plans that Mrs. Atkin has proposed for downtown Mooresville. Perhaps the consultants have plans? Did she share that with the MDC while she was chairman of the Board? Has her ideas changed since becoming the high paid director?

Anonymous said...

what I want to know is when exactly are we going to see the audit of the Cops For Kids program? I also want to know when we can read the internal investigator's report? Then I want to know when we can see the inventory of the MPD evidence room. Then I want to know why Garry Frank hasn't charged the former police chief with fraud yet. Then I want to know why Frank Rader hasn't been charged with obstruction of justice and witness tampering. Then I want to know why Erskine Smith still has his $106,000 a year job. We're all waiting and we ain't going anywhere.

Anonymous said...

Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc Tic Toc

Anonymous said...

TELEPHONE CHARITY CALLS

With the holidays around the corner the phones will heat up with dishonest people calling to ask for money for a particular charity. Some may be legitimate, others not. Here are a few tips to prevent you from becoming a victim of fraud.

1. When a call comes in get the name of the caller, or ID #. Ask for a phone number.
2. Ask the caller for a website or other means to verify their validity.
3. Request to pay by check to the charity and ask for a receipt.
4. Don't be pressured into giving. If the caller does pressure you, simply hang up.
5. Avoid any charity that wants to "come right over" to collect the money.
6. Be cautious of promises of guaranteed sweepstakes winnings in exchange for a contribution.
7. According to U.S. law, you never have to give a donation to be eligible to win a sweepstakes.
8. After receiving a call asking for a donation, call the charity in question to find out whether it is aware of the solicitation and has authorized the use of its name.

If you receive an offer that seems to good to be true, it probably is. If you think someone is trying to scam you contact your local sheriff's office and report them. Share this article with as many people as you can. Today more than ever we all need to be vigilant when it comes to crime.

The best policy is prevention. Crime is ever growing and only you can protect yourself. Learn valuable safety tips by visiting our website and subscribing to our newsletter. Please visit our website and subscribe to our newsletter and browse our products.

http://www.ActionSelfDefenseProducts.com

Anonymous said...

If you think someone is trying to scam you contact your local sheriff's office and report them.



my mistake, cant call the sheriff in Iredell county, he's in on the scam. better call ghostbusters and say a prayer

Anonymous said...

"All told, the scam netted $10 million from 443,000 individuals, according to prosecutors"








And just so we are all clear on this, this above statement, in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA it is 443,000 individual CLASS H AND C FELONIES precisely because NORTH CAROLINA has N.C. G.S. 14-100,

However in the STATE OF WISCONSIN it is a NON-CRIMINAL Civil matter to do what RedCrone was doing. There the Attorney GENERAL just sues the ever lovin shit out of your company. But you wont be going to prison.

Kolve, was found guilty of 1 count of Racketeering, not for WHAT he did, but for WHO he did it to, namely, the elderly. RedCrone did not do that as near as I can tell. In WISCONSIN, They would have walked out of the courthouse free men.

Yet one more reason I say RedCrone and company are idiots.

Sorry about you luck boys, but the warden at Central Prison already had the trustee's make up your cell's.

To the SBI; I told you folks years ago that if you did THIS to me then you would be doing it to EVERY FUND RAISER IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA when I am done

We are only just getting started with this business of locking crooked cops and professional fund raiser's up. You all made it damn near illegal to raise money FOR ANYTHING OR ANY CAUSE in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA by case law.

INCLUDING POLITICAL FUNDRAISING!!!

Dont you all get it yet?

IF I find out you raised money money to buy kids with cancer, wigs, due to chemo, because thats what you told the donors and then you buy that same kid a big mac with raised money then according to NORTH CAROLINA LAW! YOU ARE A FELON AND ARE GOING TO PRISON! End of story.

If they can do it to me, I can do it to you. It's how that law is written.

If lawmakers dont fix it quick, I'm going to fill the prisons with former good cops and former law abiding good citizens until they include 'intent' in regards to charity fund raising in 14-100

And all of you only have John Crone to thank for it.

If they can do it to me, I can do it to you.

Now lets see who wants to help me fix a manifest injustice?

Lets all sit back and watch the little cop and fundraiser cockroaches scurry.Because the lights just got turned on all over the state this morning. But running wont help them hide from their collective pasts as there is no statue of limitations on fraud in NORTH CAROLINA. There is nothing you can do about what I am going to do about what you have done in the past, you may consider YOURSELVES ALL toast.

Anonymous said...

I was not a fan of Wayne Frick, but Kim Atkins is certainly the wrong person to lead downtown Mooresville. The only thing I am sure she can lead downtown businesses to is to a bankruptcy attorney to liquidate their failed businesses.

Anonymous said...

"All told, the scam netted $10 million from 443,000 individuals, according to prosecutors"








And just so we are all clear on this, this above statement, in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA it is 443,000 individual CLASS H AND C FELONIES precisely because NORTH CAROLINA has N.C. G.S. 14-100,

However in the STATE OF WISCONSIN it is a NON-CRIMINAL Civil matter to do what RedCrone was doing. There the Attorney GENERAL just sues the ever lovin shit out of your company. But you wont be going to prison.

Kolve, was found guilty of 1 count of Racketeering, not for WHAT he did, but for WHO he did it to, namely, the elderly. RedCrone did not do that as near as I can tell. In WISCONSIN, They would have walked out of the courthouse free men.

Yet one more reason I say RedCrone and company are idiots.

Sorry about you luck boys, but the warden at Central Prison already had the trustee's make up your cell's.

To the SBI; I told you folks years ago that if you did THIS to me then you would be doing it to EVERY FUND RAISER IN THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA when I am done

We are only just getting started with this business of locking crooked cops and professional fund raiser's up. You all made it damn near illegal to raise money FOR ANYTHING OR ANY CAUSE in the STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA by case law.

INCLUDING POLITICAL FUNDRAISING!!!

Dont you all get it yet?

IF I find out you raised money money to buy kids with cancer, wigs, due to chemo, because thats what you told the donors and then you buy that same kid a big mac with raised money then according to NORTH CAROLINA LAW! YOU ARE A FELON AND ARE GOING TO PRISON! End of story.

If they can do it to me, I can do it to you. It's how that law is written.

If lawmakers dont fix it quick, I'm going to fill the prisons with former good cops and former law abiding good citizens until they include 'intent' in regards to charity fund raising in 14-100

And all of you only have John Crone to thank for it.

If they can do it to me, I can do it to you.

Now lets see who wants to help me fix a manifest injustice?

Lets all sit back and watch the little cop and fundraiser cockroaches scurry.Because the lights just got turned on all over the state this morning. But running wont help them hide from their collective pasts as there is no statue of limitations on fraud in NORTH CAROLINA. There is nothing you can do about what I am going to do about what you have done in the past, you may consider YOURSELVES ALL toast.

Anonymous said...

btw kolve got 6 years probation and 10 months work release and a 20,000 dollar fine to help pay for his own prosecution.

Keep in mind, Kolve raised/stole 10,000,000 million dollars over 10 years.


How much did Crone take over the same 10 year time frame.

Anonymous said...

I agree with Jaime....... I love you too pumpkin... nite nite now
Tic Toc