Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Friday, December 17, 2010

Town officials optimistic about MI-Connection's new direction

In a recent press release, MI-Connection officials said they had two things to celebrate this month: the cable company’s third-year anniversary and its move toward more self-sufficiency by splitting with management company Bristol Virginia Utilities.

But let’s face it: After three years of scathing reports about MI-Connection’s financial woes – including $4.4 million needed from the Town of Mooresville and $2 million from Davidson in fiscal year 2011 – suffice it to say, a “celebration” isn’t in order.

For the first time since the towns purchased the cable system, however, town officials – even those who have vocally opposed Mooresville’s ownership of a cable company – seem to be a little optimistic. Why?

“We have been subsidizing a system that we had no say or control in how it was being managed or operated,” Commissioner Miles Atkins said. Moving the management and operation of MI-Connection to Mooresville “means there will be oversight and accountability for the first time since the system was purchased.”

Mayor Chris Montgomery says he believes a shift to more local control will have a “positive impact on subscribership, profitability and (the) overall success of the system.”

But on the other hand, eliminating an outside management company also means that one “barrier” between local government and media is being eliminated. When Mooresville and Davidson were considering the cable system’s purchase, many local residents argued that government has no place owning a private business and worse, a form of media.

Government officials, to placate those skeptics, said BVU and MI-Connection’s board of directors would provide a barrier between the government and the media. But with BVU almost out of the picture, is government one step closer to managing and controlling local media?

“Did we really ever fool anybody into thinking that government wasn’t controlling it?” asked Commissioner Chris Carney. “We may not have wanted to be in control, but once they asked for money from the towns, we were in control.”

Montgomery and Commissioner Mac Herring said the MI-Connection board of directors – whose voting members are appointed by Mooresville and Davidson commissioners – will continue to serve as a barrier between the government and media.

Commissioner Rhett Dusenbury, who along with Montgomery made MI-Connection somewhat of a campaign stumping issue last year, said he is still opposed to government owning a private-industry company. However, he said, “If a change in the company makeup saves the taxpayers money, I would support the change.”

Carney said it’s pointless to “argue philosophy” at this point because what’s done is done. He said MI-Connection “got off on the wrong foot,” and town officials owe citizens an apology for “the serious mistakes that were made.”

However, “fast-forward to today, and what you have is a complete re-launching of MI-Connection,” Carney said. “By us, along with Davidson commissioners, being more hands-on, a much better plan has emerged. We have the right groups of people in place. We have attacked it from every angle we can, and now we’re seeing results.

“We’re looking to get customers and cut serious costs that allow (MI-Connection) to be more effectively and efficiently run, and that’s a good thing. That’s real progress.”

MI-Connection, once the final agreement with BVU is in place, will be taking over the system’s finances, marketing and sales, business development and human resources. BVU – according to the recently signed memorandum of understanding with MI-Connection – will continue handling billing, customer-service calls and technical support.

Montgomery, in a sit-down chat this week, actually sounded excited about the possibilities once MI-Connection’s sales and marketing move from Virginia to Mooresville. He is eager for MI-Connection to start marketing itself as the small-town alternative to a corporate-giant like Time Warner Cable. And since one of his favorite parts of being mayor is interacting with people, Montgomery said he has even considered making personal calls to residents to chat with them about MI-Connection.

The fact is, MI-Connection needs more customers to generate more revenue and pay its debt service. And as was pointed out by Davidson Town Manager Leamon Brice in a February 2010 letter reprinted at www.DavidsonNews.net, “until new customers sign up for telephone, internet and cable services, the towns will be required to subsidize MI-Connection.” Although the potential extent of that subsidy is frightening, residents are tired of being “scared” into signing up for MI-Connection, especially when public opinion was overwhelmingly against the town’s purchase of the system in the first place. And clearly, bullying residents hasn’t proven to be effective.

While perhaps “unsophisticated” and unlikely, since government officials don’t have time to personally call each and every Mooresville and Davidson resident to chat about cable, Montgomery’s approach is a breath of fresh air compared to the alternative. He says it just makes sense: “I don’t believe in shoving it down people’s throats. I would just like to talk to people about it. Time Warner is a corporate machine. We need to bring MI-Connection down to a level where it’s more personable.”

And moving MI-Connection’s operations from Virginia to Mooresville means marketing and sales ideas will be tailored to local people by local people.

Still, not everything is sunshine and rainbows. Many promises were made to Mooresville and Davison residents about MI-Connection, and the cable system, in its three years, hasn’t delivered. We were told MI-Connection would be profitable in five years and that the original debt for the system’s purchase would be repaid entirely through system revenues. That hasn’t happened – by a long shot. We were told MI-Connection would build fiber-to-the-premises infrastructure, making the system a driving force for economic development. That hasn’t turned out to be true, either.

The optimism among government leaders – even those who have opposed MI-Connection in the past – isn’t going to magically make everything better. It isn’t going to fix the mistakes that have been made, and it isn’t going to make the system successful or profitable overnight. But it is nice to know that a little hope exists in an otherwise seemingly hopeless situation.

Optimism is a welcome change.

This column was originally printed in the Dec. 17 edition of Mooresville Weekly. To participate in the discussion, leave comments here or at http://mooresvilleweekly.com/opinion/2010/12/‘mi-correction’/

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Please! Give me a break! The structural issues are still there! Small and weak footprint, high procurement costs, high programming costs, major cable and satellite competition, lack of R&D funds for technological expansion and a huge onerous debt burden.

None of these have changed since the BVU expulsion! NONE...let me repeat myself ...NONE!...

Carney's statement is absurd!..."complete re-launching of MI-Connection,” Carney said. “By us, along with Davidson commissioners, being more hands-on, a much better plan has emerged. We have the right groups of people in place. We have attacked it from every angle we can, and now we’re seeing results."

Where have you been Chris? Why haven't you been involved up to this point? Why didn't you have control? What re-launching? There, my dear Townspeople, is a man out of touch with what has been going on since the MIC inception and now wants us to believe he will be more hands on!? Sounds like he wants a 'bye' on his inaction for the past almost three years!

Mr. Carney, show us some concrete steps you have or will take to make MIC a viable service. Your rhetoric must stop!

And now for Mr. Montgomery. He was dealt a bad hand when he inherited this fiasco from the past Mayor but he was elected knowing full well what he would face. And we elected him to proactively do something about getting out from under the fiscal burden of MIC. Again, I guess this was rhetoric as well.

Apparently, he is now excited about the 'possibilities' forgetting the fact that MIC is a small player surrounded by a huge, well funded and feature rich competitor (Time Warner). Again, it seems as if our elected officials are trying to see through rose colored glasses in an effort to diminish the effects of MIC on our Town. Pure propaganda fellow Townspeople. Pure hogwash!

BVU wasn't the cause of this! Government sticking its nose into private enterprise was the cause. They hung our Town out to dry and are now ignoring the structural issues which made this a bad choice to begin with!

And, now the Government will be in control and have the ability to monitor our programming, calling patterns and our internet usage. George Orwell must be living in Mooresville!

We will be subsidizing this system, as it technologically withers for many years in the future and forgoing essential projects to keep MIC afloat.

Elected officials how about telling us the TRUTH! How much more will MIC need in the next year, two years, five years? And what will Mooresville have to forgo? What won't get done? Who won't get hired? How much are the taxes going to be raised to subsidize MIC?

What, precisely, is your PLAN? If you were running a business or a household, you would have a plan. What is it!?

Write it down, publicize it, talk about it, explain it to us but don't try to pull the wool over our eyes and say everything is now under control! That is too imprecise; it is time to talk about FACTS and FIGURES!

We've had enough!

Vic Marquis said...

Well, Kudos to this Anonymous chatter !!!!!
I don't have to add my two cents worth, since all was said about Carney, and all the others about pulling the wool over our eyes.
Do they all think we are as stupid as they are???
Well, I want to congratulate the anonymous person, for having it all right.
Too bad the rest of Mooresville people don't just SAY NO to it all.

Jim said...

Dear Mayor Montgomery,

I am one of the 2,000 Charlotte area employees of "corporate giant" Time Warner Cable. Many of us live in Mooresville and Davidson. We all pay taxes and we all contribute to the local economy.

While I certainly understand that you are in a difficult position with MIC, I wish you would stop echoing the chants of the previous mayor. Time Warner is not the evil villain in this mess.

The town board, including Commissioners Herring and Carney thought they knew more than the dozens of speakers at the town hall meetings. They VOTED to buy this system...the evil corporate giant didn't force them to do so.

So, when you are making your calls urging people to sign up for an inferior product for the "good of the town" you can skip me. I'll stick with the better value for my money.

Jim (corporate giant employee)

Anonymous said...

If we're going to have local people directing MIC , I think it's time we give Thunberg and Rader an opportunity to lead us out of this cesspool they put us in.

Anonymous said...

Under the conditions set when the town borrowed the money to purchase this albatross, is it even legal for the town to use taxpayer money every year to subsidize a service that does not benefit all taxpayers? Can the town be sued for misappropriation of funds?
Maybe we should cut our losses. Sell the golf course and use the proceeds to pay off the cable dedt. Then sell the cable system to the "evil giant Time-Warner". We would probably still lose money but not near as much as if we keep these losers.

Anonymous said...

Part I
I think the Orwellian stuff is a bit overblown-let's focus on business and consumer behavior:

So now the towns have parted ways with BVU-the company who nearly 4 years ago saw the same business plan that the powers-that-be (or were) saw and said "Yes we can!!!"

We are closing in on the halfway point of the '11 fiscal year-so according to the newest 'plan' that was being touted this summer MIC should have gained 7500 Revenue Generating Units. These equate to a net +2500 new 'Triple Play' customers.

I’m sure when we see MIC's customer count in early Feb-you'll see why BVU was handed the pink slip. Reports in Davidsonnews.net painted a bleak picture at the end of the 1st 3 months and there was mention that it wasn't the complete picture because an apartment complex was switching to a competitor.

Let me put on my Amazing Kreskin (or Carnac) hat and predict what's coming in the NEXT 6 months:

The 'new' MIC will really get in the weeds and find out that things are even worse then they thought (Stop me if you've heard this before).

"Since taking over local control we've seen impressive progressive over the final 6 months of the fiscal year but it did not give us enough time to address some of the key growth objectives outlined at the public meetings"

The $1.2 million in savings being touted will not be a savings at all. "We'll have to wait until next year to fully see the impact of those savings."

Some of the leftover BVU employees will be let go-because they did not share the vision of the new MIC. You may or may not hear about these.

Rate Increases which will lead to further customer erosion.

Montgomery's 'chats' about MIC will grow in their desperation as the fiscal year closes and election season nears.

Fiscal 2012: Now We REALLY Know What We're Doing

Anonymous said...

Part II

Folks, we were sold optimism over 4 years ago. What we had then and now is spin. Shame on Time Warner-the 2nd largest cable company-for not kowtowing to the towns that were out of touch with their citizens.

At a recent public meeting it was revealed that in the Mooresville area MIC had LESS than 4 out of 10 homes. Cable penetration is running around the 50%-60% depending on services offered and competition. Would a number like this not have shown up on a due diligence report or at the very least shown those who voted for this that residents made their choice long ago? The argument for delivering a better system for the good of the citizens was moot in 2006.

The whole 'hometown' feel good approach is wonderful but the reality is we live in a Wal-Mart world where buying in bulk helps keep costs low. 20 years ago, the Mom and Pop cable companies made up the majority-anyone remember Lakeside, Summit or Prestige? There were thousands of small companies like them providing adequate service. In 2000 Prestige figured out that they were unable to keep up with the times and getting out of the business was their only viable option.

Now we are being told those were the good old days. Time Warner, dish and AT&T can leverage their size and distribution to receive lower programming costs compared to today's "Mom and Pop" which MIC is. Truth is costs are higher now that you have local channels charging cable companies for subscriber fees. If Prestige had sold to Time Warner (instead of Adelphia) 10 years ago, the towns would not be in the cable business. Instead of looking at a $6 million+ annual Cable Bill they would be collecting revenues from cable franchise fees that would contribute to keeping taxes lower not facing the certainty of raising them. But Prestige took Adelphia's (bad) money.

However, when given the option to finally go with Time Warner and after the majority of towns went with Time Warner in '07; they still opted to go it on their own along with Cornelius who has absolutely no skin in the game.

The only difference with the decision to cut BVU out of the equation and the decision in '07 is that there is nobody left to blame. Except maybe the citizens who didn't want it in the first place.

Jim said...

Anon 10:53,

I agree with many of your points...but please understand....we are not parting ways with BVU. Billing, customer service, and technical support will reamin with BVU...and this is no small part of the operation.

As for the $1.5 million of "savings"....is there really any savings once you account for all of the positions that MIC will now be responsible for?

To me it's ironic that three years ago, when the people of the town got up and asked "what do you know about running a cable company?" the (then) board said they didn't have to know..."that's why BVU will be running it".

I believe this move has more to do with the (present) board getting frustrated. They are getting the grief and the substantial bills and have had no control over where this thing is going.

You have to wonder if the MIC GM and the MIC Board will hear this message. You can only rearrange the deck chairs on the Titanic for so long...

Jim