Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Identity theft made easy in Iredell

While little may be known about the Iredell County Register of Deeds office, the Republican challenger for the seat has uncovered a potentially huge problem.

Many county residents could be at risk for identity theft because documents – readily available to the public through the Register of Deeds online – include names and social-security numbers.

“This is the perfect-storm type of scenario,” said Matt McCall, the Republican candidate for Iredell County Register of Deeds, who held a press conference yesterday to discuss the identity-protection issues.

The Register of Deeds, according to the county website, “serves as custodian and manager of a large number of public records. These include legal documents such as deeds, deeds of trust, powers of attorney, maps, etc.” The office also issues marriage licenses, certified birth and death certificates and administers oaths to notaries, military discharges and others, the website states.

In a message to citizens, current Register of Deeds Brenda Bell (D) states: “ I appreciate the trust and confidence placed in me by the Iredell County citizens. I am here to provide the office with integrity, completeness, accuracy and efficient safekeeping of the public records.”

But McCall says the Register of Deeds has left some Iredell citizens vulnerable for identity theft – and it's something that while legal, could easily be prevented.

Armed with a stack of public documents divulging the names and social-security numbers of several Iredell County public officials and employees, McCall said: “It's time for the citizens of Iredell County to have a proactive Register of Deeds to make protecting their identities a priority.”

McCall asked the press not to divulge the specific type of document on which the information is listed, in the interest of protecting those peoples' personal information as much as possible. However, he said, finding the social-security numbers of those public officials and employees – including county commissioners, firefighters and police officers – was as simple as logging onto a website as a guest.

McCall said he brought to the press conference only a small representative sample of the people who could be at risk. “There are at least hundreds, if not thousands, of these records online,” he said, adding that the people he found who are most at risk are those whose records were filed between 1989 and 1995.

He said he has begun contacting each public official and employee whose social-security number he found online.

Anyone can request to have their personal information redacted from public documents, per the N.C. Identity Protection Act of 2005, McCall said. Thanks to that Act, citizens can submit a written request – with the book and page number of where their social-security number is exposed – to have their personal information redacted.

Five years ago, when the law was passed, my opponent should have taken proactive measures to make citizens aware that the exposure was there,” McCall said, adding that Brenda Bell has been Register of Deeds for 20 years.

Unfortunately,” he added, “most citizens of Iredell County haven't heard of the N.C. Identity Protection Act of 2005. But what they should know is that the very strong possibility is that their social security numbers are unprotected online at the Register of Deeds.”

One year ago, McCall said, the N.C. Identity Protection Act was amended to take the burden out of the hands of citizens to have their personal information redacted. Instead, the amendment gave discretion to registers of deeds to use “character recognition technology” to scrub the personal information from public documents:

N.C. General Statutue 132.1.10(f1) states: “Without a request made pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, a register of deeds or clerk of court may remove from an image or copy of an official record placed on a register of deeds' or clerk of court's Internet Web site available to the general public, or placed on an Internet Web site available to the general public used by a register of deeds or clerk of court to display public records, a person's social security or drivers license number contained in that official record. Registers of deeds and clerks of court may apply optical character recognition technology or other reasonably available technology to official records placed on Internet Web sites available to the general public in order to, in good faith, identify and redact social security and drivers license numbers.”

"We've had the power to remove this information from public records, without the citizens' request, for over a year," McCall told the Report today.

He said in yesterday's press conference that he had contacted another county that had redacted personal information from its public records and paid approximately $34,000 for the entire process. McCall said $34,000 for the Register of Deeds to scrub citizens' personal information off public documents is a relatively small price to pay to protect the county's citizens, especially, he added, when the current Register of Deeds has a $5,000 car allowance.

Iredell County Manager Joel Mashburn said that he could not recall an instance of the current Register of Deeds approaching him or the county about appropriating money to have the information removed from public documents, McCall said.

He said he had also spoken with Iredell County Commissioner Scott Keadle, who told McCall that he would "absolutely be in favor" of allocating money to have the social-security numbers redacted from easily-accessible public documents.

McCall said today: "As a fiscal conservative, I hate spending money. I want to be as frugal as possible, but this is something that needs to be fixed."

Having the information removed is not mandatory, but “the law says it is up to the office-holders' discretion,” McCall said. “Unfortunately, the current office-holder has taken no proactive measures to redact the social-security numbers.”

He said the Federal Trade Commission estimates that 300,000 North Carolinians fall victim to identity theft every year, and the commission has stated that the worst type of identity theft “is when someone opens an account in your name.” McCall said those victims spend, on average, $1,100 and 60 hours “undoing the damage.”

So while it used to be common practice for social-security numbers to be included on public documents – and it's perfectly within statutes for the records to contain that information – McCall said it just makes sense, with identity theft occurring at an alarming rate across the state, that Iredell's Register of Deeds would have removed that information in the past year that the state has provided her the power to remove it without having to wait on citizens to request the removal.

McCall said he welcomes any questions from Iredell's citizens about how to remove their personal information from the Register of Deeds documents. Call him at 704-662-5115.

35 comments:

Anonymous said...

WOW, that's all I can say.

Anonymous said...

Come on Jaime. Are you going to be fair about reporting the "political landscape"? Seems like the only time we hear from you is when you have a personal agenda to air or a personal friend to promote. If you're not going to be objective, just say so. And if you can't be, please don't portend to be the caped crusader for the people of the area.

Anonymous said...

this story looks pretty objective to me... but i would have liked to have seen a response from bell

Sue Spath said...

OMG..............please put your name........

Anonymous said...

INTERESTING, AND THATS A FACT,,GO MATT

Anonymous said...

1:51 PM, your sure one to talk about "personal agendas". All of us out here can see that your the one with the "personal agenda" of muzzling Gatton from exposing local crooks. Thank goodness it hasn't worked!

Anonymous said...

This guy needs to dig a little deeper into the SS# redaction situation. What happens if this automated redaction process that costs $34,000 MISSES people's SS#? (which will happen) LAWSUIT! How much extra is THAT going to cost? Is he going to personally go through ALL documents filed in that office and make sure nothing was missed. I don’t think so. This guy shouldn't be elected purely for THIS fact alone -he doesn’t KNOW WHAT HE IS TALKING ABOUT! He is trying to get people scared/upset...without knowing or divulging all the info. READ the statue! IT says: "Internet Web site" you can still anonymously view that info in the office and it is AGAINST THE LAW to modify those public records in the office. If he wants to be in politics - he needs to pick some other elected official’s office - because it doesn’t seem like he has the ability to reason things out or is troublemaker.

Anonymous said...

11:00 your argument does not hold water. You seem to be searching for some way to defend the current register of deeds for her lack of due diligence in protecting the citizens of Iredell County. Why has there been NO effort made to protect us? Facts are facts and there is no way to weasel out of this. You show how classless you are by referring to McCall as "this guy". I wasn't even aware of who was running until this story came out but you can bet your ass I'll be voting for "this guy"

Anonymous said...

1100 Anonymous: You have to be the most ignorant poster around. The best defense to a lawsuit is good faith effort to protect citizens. Brenda Bell has dropped the ball. A 34 year career politician who is going to lose BADLY this year. Her time at the trough is just about up.

"This guy" is the real deal. He gets it and will fight for US.

Anonymous said...

1100: Other registries in this state have removed SSNs from online searches. Bell has done nothing. Nothing. Hackers in China can read Iredell citizens SSNs and Brenda Bell has done nothing to remove it from the unknowing citizens. Unbelivable.

Anonymous said...

11 PM Anonymous is about as dumb as a bag of rocks. It is not rocket science to read and understand what the statute says. People need to be scared and upset regarding this issue. If this dereliction of duty is occurring, can you imagine what is going on in that office on the taxpayer's dime! I went online and looked at this office's budget and I am appalled that in this economic times there is $10000 being spent on travel and training.......clearly the training isn't work. I say it is time to KICK THE BUM OUT!

Anonymous said...

The solution is not to ban public records altogether from the Internet. Instead, records should be selectively redacted, for example, by removing Social Security numbers and financial account data. Instead of publishing the full texts of sensitive proceedings such as divorce cases, on the Internet, just the index information should be published. Certain categories of case files, family court records for example, should be available at the court house and not online. These and other solutions must be sought in order to prevent the negative consequences of publishing public records online, but without losing sight of the need for access to public records in order to provide oversight of our government.

Anonymous said...

I FOUND THIS ON COTTSYSTEMS WEBSITE, THIS IS WHO IREDELL COUNTY USES FOR ITS ONLINE SERVICES FOR REGISTER OF DEEDS.

You hear it every day. Sensitive or personal data is stolen, misused or accidentally revealed—often with devastating
results. With state governments passing tough new disclosure and security laws, the responsibility for removing
sensitive information—like social security numbers—from certain public records is falling on offices like yours. So how
are you supposed to review millions of past records, flag the personal data and remove it from public view—all while
trying to manage your existing workload? Make one phone call to Cott Systems—the experts in public records since
1888.
Redaction Service for Historical Images
Cott Systems can help you protect the private information of those you serve with minimal impact on your
productivity. We can assist you in creating copies of your images in scope and delivering them to our Data and Image
Services Experts. The files are put through an Optical Character Recognition (OCR) process. Based on rigorously tested
rules configured to your state’s requirements, clues are identified and images containing social security numbers are
flagged.

Anonymous said...

Johnston County NC Register of Deeds Craig Olive has done what should have been done in Iredell. he has completed historical redaction processes for over 30,000 images,
safeguarding personal information such as driver’s license and Social Security numbers in Johnston County’s
public records. After several years of working with state senators and appealing to the North Carolina General
Assembly, Register of Deeds, Olive saw his vision become a reality with the passing of legislation supporting
the redaction of personal information in North Carolina public records. Aptitude Solutions’ Auto-Redaction
software effectively enables county governments to follow the spirit of the privacy laws by providing the ability
to identify and redact a variety of personal information (Social Security numbers, birth dates, driver’s license
numbers, etc.). Public constituents now have the ability to search for information that needs to be accessible by
law, while personal information is kept secure. Auto-Redact uses Optical Character Recognition (OCR)
technology to literally read every page of each scanned image, identify all regions that contain sensitive
information, and electronically highlight that information on the image for quality assurance and redaction.
Auto-Redact also supports multiple redaction environments, meaning that a county can simultaneously process
images on go-forward and historical bases.
Mr. Olive announced, “I am thrilled that sensitive personal information is now safeguarded from public
viewing. I will continue to strive to protect the public’s interest and push for legislation that focuses on redaction
efforts in my office, in Johnston County and throughout the state of North Carolina.”

Anonymous said...

10:09 AM

Divorce filings are not online at the ROD or with the clerk of court. Separation agreements are filed at the ROD, the rest of the divorce & custody paperwork is filed at the Clerk's office. Birth, marriage, and death records on the Iredell ROD don't show anything other than year & parents name, they don't even show the actual month & day. Criminal courtdates & convictions are public record online as it should be.

Anonymous said...

Register of Deeds Johnston County, NC
~ Craig Olive ~
Reduces the Risk
of
Identity Theft

Identity theft happens to a person every 3 seconds in the US. Johnston County Register of Deeds Craig Olive has completed historical redaction processes for over 6 million images, safeguarding personal information such as driver’s license and social security numbers in Johnston County’s public records. The software flagged approximately 30,000 images for redaction in the records. The office will continue to monitor and redact future documents. Recently, Olive joined forces with Senator David Rouzer in making the removal of personal information in North Carolina public records a state law. “I am thrilled that sensitive public information is now safeguarded from the public. I will continue to strive to protect the public’s interest and push for legislation that focuses on redaction efforts in my office, in Johnston County, and throughout the state of North Carolina,” Olive said.

Anonymous said...

O.K. Matt Mc"Call i have met you an was going to vote for "you" BUT now there's no way me or my family can support you, anyone that stands with Jamie Gatton(or what ever her real name is) i would "NEVER" vote for. But it's only 23 votes your loseing.

Anonymous said...

Jamie is merely informing you of a process being
made available that the media has not as yet made available. You don't know this Matt Mccall
check out his back ground and wait until you hear from Bell there are two sides to every story. If you want to do a public service call the County manager and your county commissioners
if you by any chance know who they are, if not take the time to find out.

Anonymous said...

I still suppporting Brenda but I would like to hear a response from her on this.

Anonymous said...

You people do not know this "guy" Matt McMacall if you do you will have opinions such as "contemptuous" " arrogant" " irresponsible" "wild" etc. becareful what you ask for. Brenda Bell is very polite and professional in her work. HE WILL NOT BE

Anonymous said...

Facts persuade me...not personal attacks. One thing I've noticed is McCall has enough guts to have his number out in the open for people to call and doesn't hide behind the anonymity of the internet. I've talked with him before and he seems like a nice, smart and professional person.

One person I have read about on this blog is about Rick Dowdle...and I know for a fact that he is the brother of Brenda Dowdle Bell.

Anonymous said...

1:33 no need to worry its already proven that if gatton is pulling for you <> you will lose ask Blocker,Nickelson an soon you can ask Alexander

Anonymous said...

I am the 11:00pm poster.

Hmm...no poster who didnt have a PERSONAL connection to McCall would ever be offended nor even think to comment on the verbage "this guy".

I believe the comment above that states: "contemptuous" " arrogant" " irresponsible" - even though I do not know him. Because only someone who were those qualities would get mad at "this guy" wording.

Anyway...Mr McCall(not "this guy")...learn more about that office and the general statues that control it. Here's another little tid bit YOU FORGOT or DIDNT KNOW....almost ALL information in the office is PUBLIC RECORD...meaning I can make a blanket request for EVERY public record in that office if I am willing to pay for them - and these are not the redacted copies either.

Please dont call me ignorant, because I could wax you in any debate on public records law.

Anonymous said...

Calling someone "this guy" is disrespectful. Thats the bottom line. From what i have read, Mr. McCall made no personal attack on Bell. Now you are the one making personal attacks and you even admited you don't know "the guy"..lol, now ain't that the pot calling the kettle black.

Anonymous said...

2:02 PM anonymous, sure you could make a public records request. It's chapter 132 of the General Statutes if you need that.

The REAL issue is for almost a year, Brenda Bell did NOTHING to protect Iredell citizens from anyone (Chinese, American, you name it) from downloading our fellow citizens social security numbers. You can sugarcoat that turd all you want, but it still a turd.

Anonymous said...

DOES ANYONE KNOW IF A REPORTER FROM THE RECORD AND LANDMARK WAS THERE?

Anonymous said...

Did someone read Brenda Bell's Comments?
Poor Mccall...He should be more careful before open his Mouth!!
Brenda Bell.. That's to the point!!!

Craig Olive said...

This is Craig Olive and I have been aware of my press release has been copied and submitted to this blog. I have not authorized or advised anyone on the topic of Identity Theft. Out of courtesy to another Register of Deeds, I would not encourage their opponent. Yes, I am the one who pushed for this bill and it was passed. I would say that about 90 percent of other Register of Deeds cannot redact due to budget restraints. They have to wait and get it budgeted. Mrs. Bell is very well thought of in the association and I consider her as a good friend. I wish her all the best in this election. I just want to set the record straight that I did not post the news release above involving my name.

Anonymous said...

CHANGING ISSUES HERE! ANY NEW UPDATES ON FORMER ASST DA CROUSE? STILL IN REHAB WAITING ON A COURT DATE FOR HIT AND RUN?? ANYONE? ANYONE?
NOTICED HE FINALLY GOT FIRED AFTER MONTHS OF DICKING AROUND AND MAKING THE REST OF US LOOK REAL BAD. TOOK LONG ENOUGH BUT,WAY TO GO KIRKMAN. YOU MIGHT HAVE SOME RE-TRYS ON YOUR HANDS AFTER DEPUTIES MADE MANY ARRESTS TO HAVE IT BLOTCHED BY BRANDON. WE GOT A SHIRT THAT SAYS, IF YOU BUY OR SALE, YOU GO TO JAIL, LETS GET HIM ONE! SHERIFF MIGHT DONATE IT

Anonymous said...

Seriously Craig Olive...I wonder if the people of Johnston County understand that you think it is okay to support a Democrat, especially one that doesn't do her job and is rarely in the office. Not to mention who has given money to Bev Perdue who signs these stupid unfunded mandates in to laws. How bout standing up for your morales if you have any.......I think I may send a letter to the media and the GOP in Johnston County alerting them of this serious matter.

Anonymous said...

Our commissioners were more than willing to address this and redact this info. Brenda Bell was MIA and did not act in time. Her liberal democrat friends will defend her and Obama until the bitter end. November is Coming!

Anonymous said...

Craig Olive huh?

Anonymous said...

Whats McCalls age and experience? Report that Jaime!!

Anonymous said...

He can bring fresh ideas and modern approach to this office instead of the antiquated way the office runs today. His experience operating a small business speaks for itself. He knows that customer service and efficiency is key, that is something that Ms. Bell could learn a thing or two about.

I spoke to Matt McCall a few weeks ago and grilled him about why he is running for this office. I wanted to make sure I wasn't supporting someone who just wanted to sit high on the hog like our current ROD. I am confident based on his experience that he is best person running for the job. And the fact that a young person is engaged politically is refreshing.

Anonymous said...

9:56 Oct. 12

I agree !!!!!!!!